NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super vs AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super und AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
- Etwa 3% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1650 MHz vs 1605 MHz
- Etwa 19% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19514 vs 16357
- Etwa 49% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 115804 vs 77476
- Etwa 34% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 338.122 vs 252.601
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4571.03 vs 3949.565
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 31.6 vs 24.769
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1653.08 vs 1322.129
- Etwa 85% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27179 vs 14699
- Etwa 85% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27179 vs 14699
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1650 MHz vs 1605 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19514 vs 16357 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 115804 vs 77476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 338.122 vs 252.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4571.03 vs 3949.565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.6 vs 24.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1653.08 vs 1322.129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 vs 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 vs 14699 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Etwa 5% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1905 MHz vs 1815 MHz
- Etwa 11% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 225 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Etwa 34% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 vs 190.349
- 1067x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2134 vs 2
Spezifikationen | |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1905 MHz vs 1815 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 921 vs 920 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 vs 190.349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 vs 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2134 vs 2 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19514 | 16357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 920 | 921 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 115804 | 77476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 338.122 | 252.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4571.03 | 3949.565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.6 | 24.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.349 | 254.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1653.08 | 1322.129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 | 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 | 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3369 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 | 2134 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | RDNA |
Codename | TU104 | Navi 10 |
Startdatum | 23 July 2019 | 7 July 2019 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $699 | $400 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 110 | 162 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1815 MHz | 1905 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1650 MHz | 1605 MHz |
CUDA-Kerne | 3072 | |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | |
Maximale GPU-Temperatur | 89 C | |
Leitungssysteme | 3072 | |
Render output units | 64 | 64 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 250 Watt | 225 Watt |
Berechnungseinheiten | 40 | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Texturfüllrate | 304.8 GT/s | |
Texture Units | 160 | |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 10.3 B | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
Anzahl der gleichzeitigen Anzeigen | 4 | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Höhe | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Länge | 10.5” (266.74mm) | |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 650 Watt | 600 Watt |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 6 pin + 8 pin | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin |
Breite | 2-Slot | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 496 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz | |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologien |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready | ||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |