NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
- Environ 42% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1110 MHz versus 780 MHz
- Environ 21% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1560 MHz versus 1290 MHz
- Environ 21% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 249.6 GTexel/s versus 206.4 GTexel/s
- Environ 17% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26458 versus 24877
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26458 versus 24877
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 12868 versus 11471
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 12868 versus 11471
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 20579 versus 13334
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 20579 versus 13334
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1110 MHz versus 780 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz versus 1290 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 249.6 GTexel/s versus 206.4 GTexel/s |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26458 versus 24877 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26458 versus 24877 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 12868 versus 11471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 12868 versus 11471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20579 versus 13334 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20579 versus 13334 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
- Environ 44% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 80 Watt versus 115 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt versus 115 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26458 | 24877 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26458 | 24877 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 12868 | 11471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 12868 | 11471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20579 | 13334 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20579 | 13334 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15502 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 89617 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 449.647 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4619.617 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 36.308 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.818 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1410.887 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10426 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Nom de code | GA104 | GA104 |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 | 12 Jan 2021 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 45 | 80 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz | 1290 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1110 MHz | 780 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:64) | 206.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS (1:1) | 13.21 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS | 13.21 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 5120 | 5120 |
Pixel fill rate | 124.8 GPixel/s | 103.2 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 249.6 GTexel/s | 206.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 80 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 17400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | Portable Device Dependent | Portable Device Dependent |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448.0 GB/s | 384.0 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |