NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 4% de pipelines plus haut: 6144 versus 5888
- 2.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 80 Watt versus 220 Watt
| Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 versus 1 Sep 2020 |
| Pipelines | 6144 versus 5888 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt versus 220 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Environ 92% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1500 MHz versus 780 MHz
- Environ 39% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1245 MHz
- Environ 33% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 317.4 GTexel/s versus 239.0 GTexel/s
- Environ 17% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 versus 16407
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 versus 641
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 versus 103038
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 versus 26045
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 versus 3719
- 9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 versus 3359
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 versus 26045
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 versus 3719
- 9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 versus 3359
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3163 versus 2644
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz versus 780 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz versus 1245 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 317.4 GTexel/s versus 239.0 GTexel/s |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 versus 16407 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 versus 641 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 versus 103038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 versus 26045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 versus 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 versus 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 versus 26045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 versus 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 versus 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 versus 2644 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16407 | 22253 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 641 | 999 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 103038 | 123479 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26045 | 31716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 13566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 31930 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26045 | 31716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 13566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 31930 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2644 | 3163 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Nom de code | GA104 | GA104 |
| Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 | 1 Sep 2020 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 137 | 44 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1245 MHz | 1725 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 780 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 239.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.30 TFLOPS (1:1) | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.30 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 6144 | 5888 |
| Pixel fill rate | 119.5 GPixel/s | 165.6 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 239.0 GTexel/s | 317.4 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 220 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 17400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 12-pin |
| Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
| Hauteur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
| Longeur | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Largeur | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 384.0 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| GPU Boost | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAT1000 8 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600M XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q vs
NVIDIARTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation
