NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile versus AMD Radeon RX 6800
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 6800 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 60% de pipelines plus haut: 6144 versus 3840
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 115 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26295 versus 16162
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 9367 versus 3719
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8604 versus 3373
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26295 versus 16162
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 9367 versus 3719
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8604 versus 3373
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 versus 28 Oct 2020 |
| Pipelines | 6144 versus 3840 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26295 versus 16162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 9367 versus 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8604 versus 3373 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26295 versus 16162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 9367 versus 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8604 versus 3373 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 6800
- Environ 53% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1700 MHz versus 1110 MHz
- Environ 36% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 2105 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Environ 70% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 505.2 GTexel/s versus 296.6 GTexel/s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 8 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 14% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 432.118 versus 371.785
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.585 versus 31.212
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 383.037 versus 190.723
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2280.457 versus 1422.602
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1700 MHz versus 1110 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 2105 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 505.2 GTexel/s versus 296.6 GTexel/s |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 8 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 432.118 versus 371.785 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.585 versus 31.212 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 383.037 versus 190.723 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2280.457 versus 1422.602 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6800
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 371.785 | 432.118 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3552.807 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.212 | 41.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.723 | 383.037 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1422.602 | 2280.457 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26295 | 16162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 9367 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8604 | 3373 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26295 | 16162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 9367 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8604 | 3373 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22131 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 988 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 129479 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3188 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 6800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GA104 | Navi 21 |
| Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 | 28 Oct 2020 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 87 | 84 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $579 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 2105 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1110 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS (1:64) | 1010 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS (1:1) | 32.33 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | 16.17 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 6144 | 3840 |
| Pixel fill rate | 148.3 GPixel/s | 202.1 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 296.6 GTexel/s | 505.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 26800 million |
| Unités de Compute | 60 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Hauteur | PCIe 4.0 x16 | 40 mm (1.6 inches) |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Largeur | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448.0 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| GPU Boost | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro GP100
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6800
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 4GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6850M XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 7700S
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600 XT
