NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile versus NVIDIA Quadro GP100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro GP100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 7% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1545 MHz versus 1442 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 296.6 GTexel/s versus 322.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 71% de pipelines plus haut: 6144 versus 3584
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 16 nm
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 115 Watt versus 235 Watt
- Environ 22% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective versus 1430 MHz
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 371.785 versus 355.937
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 31.212 versus 25.191
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 190.723 versus 144.928
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1422.602 versus 1056.078
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26295 versus 16640
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26295 versus 16640
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 versus 1 October 2016 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz versus 1442 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 296.6 GTexel/s versus 322.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 6144 versus 3584 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt versus 235 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective versus 1430 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 371.785 versus 355.937 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.212 versus 25.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.723 versus 144.928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1422.602 versus 1056.078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26295 versus 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26295 versus 16640 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro GP100
- Environ 17% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1304 MHz versus 1110 MHz
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4858.771 versus 3552.807
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13211 versus 9367
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 22133 versus 8604
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13211 versus 9367
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 22133 versus 8604
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1304 MHz versus 1110 MHz |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4858.771 versus 3552.807 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13211 versus 9367 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 22133 versus 8604 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13211 versus 9367 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 22133 versus 8604 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GP100
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 371.785 | 355.937 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3552.807 | 4858.771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.212 | 25.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.723 | 144.928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1422.602 | 1056.078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26295 | 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 9367 | 13211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8604 | 22133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26295 | 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 9367 | 13211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8604 | 22133 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15714 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88540 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Nom de code | GA104 | GP100 |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 | 1 October 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 96 | 94 |
Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1442 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1110 MHz | 1304 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 6144 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 148.3 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 296.6 GTexel/s | 322.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 235 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 15,300 million |
Performance á point flottant | 10,329 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 8-pin |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448.0 GB/s | 921.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 4096 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1430 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |