NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 115 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 190.723 versus 174.185
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26295 versus 23659
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 9367 versus 3718
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8604 versus 3358
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26295 versus 23659
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 9367 versus 3718
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8604 versus 3358
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 versus 20 September 2018 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.723 versus 174.185 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26295 versus 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 9367 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8604 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26295 versus 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 9367 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8604 versus 3358 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Environ 22% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1350 MHz versus 1110 MHz
- 8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 394.035 versus 371.785
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5461.22 versus 3552.807
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.104 versus 31.212
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1987.605 versus 1422.602
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz versus 1110 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 394.035 versus 371.785 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 versus 3552.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.104 versus 31.212 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 versus 1422.602 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 371.785 | 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3552.807 | 5461.22 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.212 | 41.104 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.723 | 174.185 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1422.602 | 1987.605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26295 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 9367 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8604 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26295 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 9367 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8604 | 3358 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21665 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 931 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 137055 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3544 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA104 | TU102 |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 | 20 September 2018 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 92 | 89 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $999 | |
Prix maintenant | $1,279.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1110 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 6144 | |
Pixel fill rate | 148.3 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 296.6 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 8-pin |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448.0 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |