NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 1% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1365 MHz versus 1350 MHz
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 27211 versus 21785
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1091 versus 935
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 209081 versus 138583
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 714.26 versus 394.035
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 60.192 versus 41.133
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2585.274 versus 1987.605
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34770 versus 23659
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34770 versus 23659
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19752 versus 14599
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2021 versus 20 September 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz versus 1350 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27211 versus 21785 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1091 versus 935 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 versus 138583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 714.26 versus 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.192 versus 41.133 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2585.274 versus 1987.605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 versus 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 versus 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19752 versus 14599 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Environ 40% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 350 Watt
- 11.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- 8.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5461.22 versus 661.977
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 173.697 versus 129.036
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 350 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 versus 661.977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.697 versus 129.036 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27211 | 21785 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1091 | 935 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 | 138583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 714.26 | 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.977 | 5461.22 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.192 | 41.133 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 129.036 | 173.697 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2585.274 | 1987.605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19752 | 14599 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA102 | TU102 |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2021 | 20 September 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1199 | $999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 49 | 83 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $1,279.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 532.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 10240 | |
Pixel fill rate | 186.5 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 532.8 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Hauteur | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 12 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 912.4 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6X |