NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 15% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 532.8 GTexel/s versus 465.1 GTexel/s
- Environ 18% de pipelines plus haut: 10240 versus 8704
- Environ 20% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 12 GB versus 10 GB
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 27094 versus 25211
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1087 versus 1042
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 209081 versus 167014
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 497.768 versus 457.414
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 60.265 versus 51.221
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34770 versus 34537
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34770 versus 34537
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19794 versus 17755
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2021 versus 1 Sep 2020 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 532.8 GTexel/s versus 465.1 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 10240 versus 8704 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 10 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27094 versus 25211 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1087 versus 1042 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 versus 167014 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 497.768 versus 457.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.265 versus 51.221 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2390.028 versus 2381.93 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 versus 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 versus 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19794 versus 17755 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- Environ 5% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1440 MHz versus 1365 MHz
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1710 MHz versus 1665 MHz
- Environ 9% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 320 Watt versus 350 Watt
- 9.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6022.79 versus 661.977
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 versus 128.381
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1440 MHz versus 1365 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1710 MHz versus 1665 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 320 Watt versus 350 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 versus 661.977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 versus 128.381 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27094 | 25211 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1087 | 1042 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 | 167014 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 497.768 | 457.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.977 | 6022.79 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.265 | 51.221 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 128.381 | 175.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2390.028 | 2381.93 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 | 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 | 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19794 | 17755 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Nom de code | GA102 | GA102 |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2021 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1199 | $699 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 56 | 55 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 532.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS (1:1) | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS | 29.77 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 10240 | 8704 |
Pixel fill rate | 186.5 GPixel/s | 164.2 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 532.8 GTexel/s | 465.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 320 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 28300 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Hauteur | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | 40 mm, 1.6 inches |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Longeur | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | 285 mm, 11.2 inches |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 Watt | 700 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 12 GB | 10 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 912.4 GB/s | 760.3 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 320 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |