NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 60% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 47 Watt versus 75 Watt
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt versus 75 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
- Environ 4% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1354 MHz versus 1303 MHz
- Environ 1% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 59.72 GTexel / s versus 59.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 1% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,911 gflops versus 1,894 gflops
- Environ 17% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7008 MHz versus 6008 MHz
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7239 versus 5923
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7239 versus 5923
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1354 MHz versus 1303 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 59.72 GTexel / s versus 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,911 gflops versus 1,894 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz versus 6008 MHz |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 versus 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 versus 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7239 versus 5923 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7239 versus 5923 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5923 | 7239 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5923 | 7239 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4463 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 292 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17466 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2084 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Nom de code | GP107 | GP106B |
| Date de sortie | 7 February 2017 | 1 February 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 525 | 595 |
| Genre | Workstation | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1493 MHz | 1493 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1303 MHz | 1354 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,894 gflops | 1,911 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 59.2 GTexel / s | 59.72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 4,400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.19 GB / s | 112.1 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 7008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 565v
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 7690M
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R7 340 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 370X
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX450
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX
