NVIDIA RTX A4000 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A4000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 6 mois plus tard
- 2.1x plus de pipelines: 6144 versus 2944
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 54% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 140 Watt versus 215 Watt
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19568 versus 18757
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1021 versus 907
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 121168 versus 105037
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 420.465 versus 326.494
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4156.52 versus 3938.377
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 32.297 versus 31.684
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.131 versus 159.275
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1895.111 versus 1506.874
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2598 versus 1763
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 versus 20 September 2018 |
Pipelines | 6144 versus 2944 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt versus 215 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19568 versus 18757 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1021 versus 907 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 121168 versus 105037 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 versus 326.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 versus 3938.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 versus 31.684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 versus 159.275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 versus 1506.874 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2598 versus 1763 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- 2.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1515 MHz versus 735 MHz
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1710 MHz versus 1560 MHz
- 8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 versus 22050
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 versus 3715
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 versus 3355
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 versus 22050
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 versus 3715
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 versus 3355
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1515 MHz versus 735 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1710 MHz versus 1560 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 versus 22050 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 versus 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 versus 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 versus 22050 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 versus 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19568 | 18757 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1021 | 907 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 121168 | 105037 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 | 326.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 | 3938.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 | 31.684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 | 159.275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 | 1506.874 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 6293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 6293 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2598 | 1763 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA104 | TU104 |
Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 | 20 September 2018 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 105 | 104 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | |
Prix maintenant | $749.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 6144 | 2944 |
Pixel fill rate | 149.8 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 299.5 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 215 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 16 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |