NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 16% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1405 MHz versus 1215 MHz
- Environ 15% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1582 MHz versus 1379 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 379.7 GTexel / s versus 176.5 GTexel / s
- Environ 88% de pipelines plus haut: 3840 versus 2048
- 2.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 12,150 gflops versus 5,648 gflops
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 12 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 42% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 11408 MHz versus 8008 MHz
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 65520 versus 37928
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4303.239 versus 2293.496
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 23.759 versus 12.704
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 163.551 versus 139.717
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1382.954 versus 692.9
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16138 versus 14915
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16138 versus 14915
- 2.1x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10139 versus 4887
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 4 November 2017 versus 27 June 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1405 MHz versus 1215 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz versus 1379 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 379.7 GTexel / s versus 176.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3840 versus 2048 |
Performance á point flottant | 12,150 gflops versus 5,648 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 8 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 11408 MHz versus 8008 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 65520 versus 37928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 versus 2293.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 versus 12.704 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 versus 139.717 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 versus 692.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16138 versus 14915 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16138 versus 14915 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10139 versus 4887 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 115 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 214.123 versus 146.609
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8902 versus 3714
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8048 versus 3355
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8902 versus 3714
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8048 versus 3355
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 214.123 versus 146.609 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8902 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8048 versus 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8902 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8048 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 65520 | 37928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 146.609 | 214.123 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 | 2293.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 | 12.704 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 | 139.717 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 | 692.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16138 | 14915 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 8902 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 8048 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16138 | 14915 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 8902 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 8048 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10139 | 4887 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9884 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 437 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Nom de code | GP102 | GP104 |
Date de sortie | 4 November 2017 | 27 June 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,199 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 215 | 221 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz | 1379 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1405 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 12,150 gflops | 5,648 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 3840 | 2048 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 379.7 GTexel / s | 176.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 115 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 11,800 million | 7,200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 547.6 GB / s | 256.3 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 11408 MHz | 8008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |