NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire versus AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 51% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1582 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 41% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 379.7 GTexel / s versus 268.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 41% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 12,150 gflops versus 8,602 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 10% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 275 Watt
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 12 GB versus 4 GB
- 10.9x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 11408 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 296.223 versus 155.307
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4303.239 versus 3431.249
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 23.759 versus 12.49
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 163.551 versus 153.089
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1382.954 versus 857.575
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16138 versus 8673
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16138 versus 8673
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 4 November 2017 versus 24 June 2015 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 379.7 GTexel / s versus 268.8 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 12,150 gflops versus 8,602 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 275 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 11408 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 296.223 versus 155.307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 versus 3431.249 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 versus 12.49 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 versus 153.089 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 versus 857.575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16138 versus 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16138 versus 8673 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
- Environ 7% de pipelines plus haut: 4096 versus 3840
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8925 versus 3714
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8925 versus 3714
- 2.2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5170 versus 2345
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 4096 versus 3840 |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8925 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8925 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5170 versus 2345 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 65520 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 296.223 | 155.307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 | 3431.249 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 | 12.49 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 | 153.089 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 | 857.575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16138 | 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 8925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16138 | 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 8925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3361 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2345 | 5170 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9579 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 801 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
| Nom de code | GP102 | Fiji |
| Date de sortie | 4 November 2017 | 24 June 2015 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,199 | $649 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 214 | 217 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1405 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 12,150 gflops | 8,602 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 3840 | 4096 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 379.7 GTexel / s | 268.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 11,800 million | 8,900 million |
| Unités de Compute | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 191 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 12 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 547.6 GB / s | 512 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 4096 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 11408 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5X | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
| Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire avec des autres
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire vs
AMDRadeon R9 FURY X
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire vs
AppleA14 Bionic
