NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order versus AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 13% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1405 MHz versus 1247 MHz
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1582 MHz versus 1546 MHz
- 956.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 12,150 gflops versus 12.7 TFLOPs
- Environ 18% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 295 Watt
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 12 GB versus 8 GB
- 6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 11408 MHz versus 1890 MHz
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4303.239 versus 2129.009
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 23.759 versus 14.889
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 163.551 versus 129.271
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1382.954 versus 1328.033
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16138 versus 14744
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16138 versus 14744
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10139 versus 7527
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 4 November 2017 versus 7 August 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1405 MHz versus 1247 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz versus 1546 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 12,150 gflops versus 12.7 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 295 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 8 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 11408 MHz versus 1890 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 versus 2129.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 versus 14.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 versus 129.271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 versus 1328.033 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16138 versus 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16138 versus 14744 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10139 versus 7527 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 395.80 GTexel/s versus 379.7 GTexel / s
- 2.1x plus de pipelines: 8192 versus 3840
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
- 3.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 204168 versus 65520
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 195.478 versus 146.609
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 395.80 GTexel/s versus 379.7 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 8192 versus 3840 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 16 nm |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 204168 versus 65520 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.478 versus 146.609 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 65520 | 204168 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 146.609 | 195.478 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 | 2129.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 | 14.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 | 129.271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 | 1328.033 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16138 | 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16138 | 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10139 | 7527 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14395 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.0 |
Nom de code | GP102 | Vega 10 |
Date de sortie | 4 November 2017 | 7 August 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,199 | $499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 216 | 170 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Conception | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
Prix maintenant | $449.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 41.07 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz | 1546 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1405 MHz | 1247 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 12,150 gflops | 12.7 TFLOPs |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 3840 | 8192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 379.7 GTexel / s | 395.80 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 295 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 11,800 million | 12,500 million |
Unités de Compute | 64 | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 840 GFLOPs | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.4 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 98.90 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Texture Units | 256 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 279 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 547.6 GB / s | 483.8 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 2048 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 11408 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5X | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore |