NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 versus NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 222.5 GTexel/s versus 379.7 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 56% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 160 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 85176 versus 65520
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.872 versus 23.759
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 versus 16138
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 versus 16138
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 November 2018 versus 4 November 2017 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.5 GTexel/s versus 379.7 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85176 versus 65520 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 versus 23.759 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 versus 16138 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 versus 16138 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3355 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
- Environ 40% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1405 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1582 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 3840 versus 2304
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 12 GB versus 8 GB
- 7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 11408 MHz versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 296.223 versus 232.933
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4303.239 versus 3728.135
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 163.551 versus 136.223
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1382.954 versus 1011.233
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2345 versus 1881
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1405 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3840 versus 2304 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 8 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 11408 MHz versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 296.223 versus 232.933 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 versus 3728.135 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 versus 136.223 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 versus 1011.233 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2345 versus 1881 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85176 | 65520 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 | 296.223 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 | 4303.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 | 23.759 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 | 163.551 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 | 1382.954 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 16138 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 16138 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1881 | 2345 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Nom de code | TU104 | GP102 |
| Génération GCN | Quadro RTX | |
| Date de sortie | 13 November 2018 | 4 November 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $899 | $1,199 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 213 | 215 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1582 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | 1405 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 3840 |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.5 GTexel/s | 379.7 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13600 million | 11,800 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 12,150 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 416.0 GB/s | 547.6 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 11408 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5700
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AppleA14 Bionic
