AMD Radeon RX 590 GME vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 590 GME and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 560.7x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6839 vs 3716
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6839 vs 3716
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 20161 vs 3357
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 20161 vs 3357
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 9 Mar 2020 vs 10 March 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6839 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6839 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20161 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20161 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1481 MHz vs 1257 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- Around 38% higher maximum memory size: 11 GB vs 8 GB
- 5.5x more memory clock speed: 11008 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective)
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 937 vs 660
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18560 vs 8572
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15019 vs 5140
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15019 vs 5140
- 2.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9869 vs 4431
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1481 MHz vs 1257 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 11 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 11008 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 vs 660 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18560 vs 8572 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15019 vs 5140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15019 vs 5140 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9869 vs 4431 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 590 GME | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 660 | 937 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8572 | 18560 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5140 | 15019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5140 | 15019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6839 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6839 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20161 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20161 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4431 | 9869 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 62877 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.837 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2406.499 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.833 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 590 GME | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Polaris 20 | GP102 |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| Launch date | 9 Mar 2020 | 10 March 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 205 | 201 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
| Price now | $826.98 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1582 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1257 MHz | 1481 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 397.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.16 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s | 354.4 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5700 million | 11,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 91 °C | |
| Pipelines | 3584 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | 600 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 11 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 484.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 352 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) | 11008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| PCIe 3.0 | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 590 GME with others
AMDRadeon RX 590 GME vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
AMDRadeon RX 590 GME vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 590 GME vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
AMDRadeon RX 590 GME vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 590 GME vs
AppleA14 Bionic
AMDRadeon RX 590 GME vs
IntelArc A310
