AMD A10-9600P vs AMD A12-9720P
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD A10-9600P und AMD A12-9720P Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A10-9600P
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 51.119 vs 44.985
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 51.119 vs 44.985 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A12-9720P
- Etwa 9% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1306 vs 1156
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 2638 vs 2352
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 397 vs 357
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1103 vs 1003
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.334 vs 2.935
- 24.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 130.347 vs 5.264
- 7.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.039 vs 0.147
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 17.054 vs 15.767
- Etwa 34% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1403 vs 1047
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1857 vs 1657
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6187 vs 5281
- Etwa 34% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1403 vs 1047
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1857 vs 1657
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6187 vs 5281
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1306 vs 1156 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2638 vs 2352 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 397 vs 357 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1103 vs 1003 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.334 vs 2.935 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 130.347 vs 5.264 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.039 vs 0.147 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.054 vs 15.767 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1403 vs 1047 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1857 vs 1657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6187 vs 5281 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1403 vs 1047 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1857 vs 1657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6187 vs 5281 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD A10-9600P
CPU 2: AMD A12-9720P
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD A10-9600P | AMD A12-9720P |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1156 | 1306 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2352 | 2638 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 357 | 397 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1003 | 1103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.935 | 9.334 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5.264 | 130.347 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.147 | 1.039 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.767 | 17.054 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 51.119 | 44.985 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1047 | 1403 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1657 | 1857 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5281 | 6187 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1047 | 1403 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1657 | 1857 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5281 | 6187 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD A10-9600P | AMD A12-9720P | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Bristol Ridge | Bristol Ridge |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
| Startdatum | 1 June 2016 | 1 June 2016 |
| OPN Tray | AM960PADY44AB | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1671 | 1301 |
| Serie | AMD A10-Series APU for Laptops | AMD Bristol Ridge |
| Vertikales Segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 2.4 GHz | |
| Matrizengröße | 250 mm | 250 mm |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 90°C | 90 °C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.3 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 3100 Million | 3100 Million |
| Freigegeben | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | |
| Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR4 | |
Grafik |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 720 MHz | |
| iGPU Kernzahl | 6 | |
| Prozessorgrafiken | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | |
| Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
| Configurable TDP | 12-15 Watt | |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FP4 | FP4 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 8 | |
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| AMD Secure technology | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche AMD A10-9600P mit anderen
AMDA10-9600P vs
IntelCore i7-3610QE
AMDA10-9600P vs
AMDA8-5550M
AMDA10-9600P vs
AMDPRO A6-9500B
AMDA10-9600P vs
AMDA8-7050
AMDA10-9600P vs
IntelXeon E3-1284L v3
AMDA10-9600P vs
IntelCeleron J6413
