AMD Pro A10-8700B vs AMD A10-7300
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Pro A10-8700B und AMD A10-7300 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Pro A10-8700B
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 0 Jahr(e) 11 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 33% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 20 Watt
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1122 vs 861
- Etwa 27% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 2217 vs 1739
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 325 vs 303
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 883 vs 794
- 3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.722 vs 0.897
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.138 vs 0.124
- 56.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.35 vs 0.375
- Etwa 46% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.422 vs 2.351
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 3 June 2015 vs 4 June 2014 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 20 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1122 vs 861 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2217 vs 1739 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 325 vs 303 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 883 vs 794 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.722 vs 0.897 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.138 vs 0.124 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.35 vs 0.375 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.422 vs 2.351 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A10-7300
- 2x mehr L2 Cache, mehr Daten können im L2 Cache gespeichert werden, um später schnell darauf zugreifen zu können
- 3.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 10.705 vs 2.877
- Etwa 67% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2948 vs 1763
- Etwa 67% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2948 vs 1763
| Spezifikationen | |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB vs 2 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 10.705 vs 2.877 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2948 vs 1763 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2948 vs 1763 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD Pro A10-8700B
CPU 2: AMD A10-7300
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Pro A10-8700B | AMD A10-7300 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1122 | 861 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2217 | 1739 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 325 | 303 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 883 | 794 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.722 | 0.897 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2.877 | 10.705 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.138 | 0.124 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.35 | 0.375 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.422 | 2.351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1763 | 2948 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1763 | 2948 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 994 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1904 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 994 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1904 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD Pro A10-8700B | AMD A10-7300 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Carrizo | Kaveri |
| Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | AMD A-Series Processors |
| Startdatum | 3 June 2015 | 4 June 2014 |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, Windows 7 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 2260 | 2251 |
| Serie | AMD PRO A-Series A10 APU for Laptops | AMD A10-Series APU for Laptops |
| Vertikales Segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| OPN Tray | AM7300ECH44JA | |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 1.8 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| Compute Cores | 10 | 10 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | 6 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 3100 Million | 2410 Million |
| Freigegeben | ||
| Matrizengröße | 245 mm | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3 / DDR3L-2133 | Not Listed |
Grafik |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 800 MHz | 553 MHz |
| iGPU Kernzahl | 384 | 6 |
| Anzahl der Rohrleitungen | 384 | |
| Prozessorgrafiken | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics |
| Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
| Unterstützte Sockel | FP4 | FP3 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 20 Watt |
Peripherien |
||
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| RAID | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche AMD Pro A10-8700B mit anderen
AMDPro A10-8700B vs
AMDAthlon II N350
AMDPro A10-8700B vs
IntelCore i7-3555LE
AMDPro A10-8700B vs
AMDA4-4300M
AMDPro A10-8700B vs
IntelAtom E3827
AMDPro A10-8700B vs
AMDA6-7310
AMDPro A10-8700B vs
IntelCeleron 2002E
