AMD A10-9600P vs AMD Pro A12-8800B
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD A10-9600P und AMD Pro A12-8800B Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A10-9600P
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 0 Jahr(e) 11 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 357 vs 321
- Etwa 34% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1003 vs 747
- Etwa 40% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.147 vs 0.105
- 23.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 51.119 vs 2.135
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1657 vs 1613
- Etwa 58% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5281 vs 3336
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1657 vs 1613
- Etwa 58% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5281 vs 3336
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 1 June 2016 vs 3 June 2015 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 357 vs 321 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1003 vs 747 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.147 vs 0.105 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 51.119 vs 2.135 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1657 vs 1613 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5281 vs 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1657 vs 1613 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5281 vs 3336 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Pro A12-8800B
- Etwa 3% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1315 vs 1145
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 2580 vs 2333
- 5.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.844 vs 2.935
- 39.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 207.144 vs 5.264
- Etwa 31% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.617 vs 15.767
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1266 vs 1047
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1266 vs 1047
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1315 vs 1145 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2580 vs 2333 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.844 vs 2.935 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 207.144 vs 5.264 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.617 vs 15.767 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1266 vs 1047 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1266 vs 1047 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD A10-9600P
CPU 2: AMD Pro A12-8800B
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD A10-9600P | AMD Pro A12-8800B |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1145 | 1315 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2333 | 2580 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 357 | 321 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1003 | 747 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.935 | 14.844 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5.264 | 207.144 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.147 | 0.105 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.767 | 20.617 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 51.119 | 2.135 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1047 | 1266 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1657 | 1613 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5281 | 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1047 | 1266 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1657 | 1613 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5281 | 3336 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD A10-9600P | AMD Pro A12-8800B | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Bristol Ridge | Carrizo |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | AMD PRO A-Series Processors |
| Startdatum | 1 June 2016 | 3 June 2015 |
| OPN Tray | AM960PADY44AB | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, Windows 7 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1670 | 1660 |
| Serie | AMD A10-Series APU for Laptops | AMD PRO A-Series A12 APU for Laptops |
| Vertikales Segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Matrizengröße | 250 mm | |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 90°C | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.3 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | 8 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 3100 Million | 3100 Million |
| Freigegeben | ||
| Compute Cores | 12 | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR4 | DDR3 / DDR3L-2133 |
Grafik |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 720 MHz | 800 MHz |
| iGPU Kernzahl | 6 | 512 |
| Prozessorgrafiken | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
| Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Anzahl der Rohrleitungen | 512 | |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
| Configurable TDP | 12-15 Watt | |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FP4 | FP4 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 8 | |
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| AMD Secure technology | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| RAID | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche AMD A10-9600P mit anderen
AMDA10-9600P vs
AMDPRO A6-9500B
AMDA10-9600P vs
IntelXeon E5-2648L v3
AMDA10-9600P vs
IntelXeon E5-4648 v3
AMDA10-9600P vs
AMDA8-7050
AMDA10-9600P vs
IntelXeon E3-1284L v3
AMDA10-9600P vs
AMDRyzen 5 3580U
