AMD Ryzen 5 2400G vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Ryzen 5 2400G und AMD Ryzen 3 2200G Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- 4 Mehr Kanäle: 8 vs 4
- Etwa 5% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.9 GHz vs 3.7 GHz
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2150 vs 2052
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 8729 vs 6767
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 3173 vs 2736
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score: 2013 vs 1678
- Etwa 48% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.311 vs 28.581
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 375.23 vs 356.091
- Etwa 33% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.018 vs 2.276
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.366 vs 38.679
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3013 vs 2802
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3013 vs 2802
| Spezifikationen | |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 8 vs 4 |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.9 GHz vs 3.7 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2150 vs 2052 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 8729 vs 6767 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 853 vs 852 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3173 vs 2736 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2013 vs 1678 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.311 vs 28.581 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 375.23 vs 356.091 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.018 vs 2.276 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.366 vs 38.679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3013 vs 2802 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3013 vs 2802 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- 21.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 136.274 vs 6.358
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3768 vs 3310
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10990 vs 10372
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3768 vs 3310
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10990 vs 10372
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 136.274 vs 6.358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3768 vs 3310 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10990 vs 10372 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3768 vs 3310 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10990 vs 10372 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2150 | 2052 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 8729 | 6767 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 853 | 852 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3173 | 2736 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2013 | 1678 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.311 | 28.581 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 375.23 | 356.091 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.018 | 2.276 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.366 | 38.679 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.358 | 136.274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3013 | 2802 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3310 | 3768 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10372 | 10990 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3013 | 2802 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3310 | 3768 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10372 | 10990 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Zen | Zen |
| Family | AMD Ryzen Processors | AMD Ryzen Processors |
| Startdatum | 12 February 2018 | 12 February 2018 |
| OPN PIB | YD2400C5FBBOX | YD2200C5FBBOX |
| OPN Tray | YD2400C5M4MFB | YD2200C5M4MFB |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 377 | 316 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $158.99 | $97.99 |
| Serie | AMD Ryzen 5 Desktop Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics | AMD Ryzen 3 Desktop Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 17.20 | 22.31 |
| Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 3.6 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Matrizengröße | 246 mm | 246 mm |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm FinFET | 14 nm FinFET |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 95°C | 95°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.9 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 11 | 8 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 8 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 4500 Million | 4500 Million |
| Freigegeben | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2933 MHz | 2993 MHz |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Grafik |
||
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 1250 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| iGPU Kernzahl | 11 | 8 |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 Graphics |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
| Configurable TDP | 46-65 Watt | 46-65 Watt |
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Unterstützte Sockel | AM4 | AM4 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | Wraith Stealth | Wraith Stealth |
Peripherien |
||
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 x8 | 3.0 x8 |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| AMD SenseMI | ||
| AMD VR Ready Processors | ||
| Enmotus FuzeDrive | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche AMD Ryzen 5 2400G mit anderen
AMDRyzen 5 2400G vs
IntelCore i9-9990XE
AMDRyzen 5 2400G vs
AMDRyzen 5 5600GE
AMDRyzen 5 2400G vs
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 5650G
AMDRyzen 5 2400G vs
IntelCore i5-12600KF
AMDRyzen 5 2400G vs
IntelCore i5-12400T
AMDRyzen 5 2400G vs
AMDRyzen 5 5600X3D
