Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 vs AMD A10-7800
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 und AMD A10-7800 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Kompatibilität, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
- Etwa 0% höhere Kerntemperatur: 71.4°C vs 71.30°C
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 30.904 vs 10.821
- Etwa 88% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.258 vs 0.668
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 71.4°C vs 71.30°C |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30.904 vs 10.821 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.258 vs 0.668 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A10-7800
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht einen leistungsfähigeren, aber dennoch kühleren laufenden Prozessor: 28 nm vs 45 nm
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1458 vs 1216
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 3215 vs 2349
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 476 vs 412
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1390 vs 1299
- 7.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.473 vs 0.612
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.18 vs 0.175
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.524 vs 4.476
| Spezifikationen | |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm vs 45 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1458 vs 1216 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3215 vs 2349 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 476 vs 412 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1390 vs 1299 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.473 vs 0.612 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.18 vs 0.175 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.524 vs 4.476 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
CPU 2: AMD A10-7800
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 | AMD A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1216 | 1458 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2349 | 3215 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 412 | 476 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1299 | 1390 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.612 | 4.473 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30.904 | 10.821 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.175 | 0.18 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.258 | 0.668 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.476 | 4.524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1750 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1508 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3316 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1750 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1508 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3316 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 | AMD A10-7800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Yorkfield | |
| Startdatum | Q1'08 | |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 3027 | 2076 |
| Processor Number | Q9550 | |
| Serie | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | AMD A10-Series APU for Desktops |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
| OPN PIB | AD7800YBJABOX | |
| OPN Tray | AD7800YBI44JA | |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 2.83 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | |
| Matrizengröße | 214 mm2 | |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 45 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 71.4°C | 71.30°C |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 820 million | |
| VID-Spannungsbereich | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
| Compute Cores | 12 | |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.9 GHz | |
| Number of GPU cores | 8 | |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | |
| Freigegeben | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Unterstützte Sockel | LGA775 | FM2+ |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 95 Watt | |
| Configurable TDP | 45 Watt/65 Watt | |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| FSB-Parität | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | |
Grafik |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 720 MHz | |
| iGPU Kernzahl | 512 | |
| Prozessorgrafiken | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | |
| Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 mit anderen
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
IntelPentium D 950
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
AMDAthlon II X4 640
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
AMDAthlon II X4 631
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
IntelCeleron J1850
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
IntelCeleron J1800
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
AMDA4-4020
