Intel Core i3-4150 vs AMD A4-6300
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core i3-4150 und AMD A4-6300 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Grafik-Bildqualität, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i3-4150
- 2 Mehr Kanäle: 4 vs 2
- Etwa 3% höhere Kerntemperatur: 72°C vs 70°C
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht einen leistungsfähigeren, aber dennoch kühleren laufenden Prozessor: 22 nm vs 32 nm SOI
- Etwa 20% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 54 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Etwa 38% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1940 vs 1402
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 3396 vs 1428
- Etwa 74% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 767 vs 440
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1635 vs 696
- Etwa 19% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.505 vs 2.112
- 21.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 46.419 vs 2.119
- 3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.304 vs 0.1
- Etwa 94% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 721 vs 372
- Etwa 94% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 721 vs 372
| Spezifikationen | |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 72°C vs 70°C |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 22 nm vs 32 nm SOI |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 54 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1940 vs 1402 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3396 vs 1428 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 767 vs 440 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1635 vs 696 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.505 vs 2.112 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 46.419 vs 2.119 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.304 vs 0.1 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 721 vs 372 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 721 vs 372 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A4-6300
- 5.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.647 vs 1.213
- 7.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 21.25 vs 2.987
- Etwa 31% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1351 vs 1035
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2829 vs 2510
- Etwa 31% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1351 vs 1035
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2829 vs 2510
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.647 vs 1.213 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 21.25 vs 2.987 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1351 vs 1035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2829 vs 2510 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1351 vs 1035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2829 vs 2510 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core i3-4150
CPU 2: AMD A4-6300
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i3-4150 | AMD A4-6300 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1940 | 1402 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3396 | 1428 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 767 | 440 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1635 | 696 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.505 | 2.112 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 46.419 | 2.119 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.304 | 0.1 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.213 | 6.647 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.987 | 21.25 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 721 | 372 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1035 | 1351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2510 | 2829 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 721 | 372 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1035 | 1351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2510 | 2829 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Core i3-4150 | AMD A4-6300 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Haswell | Richland |
| Startdatum | Q2'14 | June 2013 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 2317 | 2303 |
| Processor Number | i3-4150 | |
| Serie | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i3 Processors | AMD A4-Series APU for Desktops |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
| OPN PIB | AD6300OKHLBOX | |
| OPN Tray | AD6300OKA23HL | |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 3.50 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 22 nm | 32 nm SOI |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 72°C | 70°C |
| Anzahl der Adern | 2 | 2 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 2 |
| Matrizengröße | 246 mm | |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 70 °C | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.9 GHz | |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1178 million | |
| Freigegeben | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 25.6 GB/s | |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 32 GB | |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V | DDR3-1600 |
| Supported memory frequency | 1600 MHz | |
Grafik |
||
| Device ID | 0x41E | |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.15 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 2 GB | |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel® HD Graphics 4400 | AMD Radeon HD 8370D |
| Enduro | ||
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 760 MHz | |
| iGPU Kernzahl | 128 | |
| Anzahl der Rohrleitungen | 128 | |
| Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | |
| VGA | ||
Grafik-Bildqualität |
||
| Maximale Auflösung über DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Maximale Auflösung über eDP | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Maximale Auflösung über HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
| Maximale Auflösung über VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | |
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 11.1/12 | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCLGA1150 | FM2 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 54 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2013C | |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 16 | |
| PCI Express Revision | Up to 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Core i3-4150 mit anderen
IntelCore i3-4150 vs
AMDPhenom II X3 700e
IntelCore i3-4150 vs
AMDAthlon II X2 260u
IntelCore i3-4150 vs
AMDPhenom II X4 B97
IntelCore i3-4150 vs
IntelCore i5-3570
IntelCore i3-4150 vs
IntelCore i5-3470S
IntelCore i3-4150 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo E6540
