Intel Core i3-4170 vs Intel Celeron G4900
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core i3-4170 und Intel Celeron G4900 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Grafik-Bildqualität, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i3-4170
- 2 Mehr Kanäle: 4 vs 2
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2053 vs 1836
- Etwa 50% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 3582 vs 2394
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 823 vs 746
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1743 vs 1353
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 46.136 vs 18.62
- Etwa 58% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.297 vs 0.188
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.273 vs 1.227
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2169 vs 1910
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3711 vs 3385
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2169 vs 1910
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3711 vs 3385
| Spezifikationen | |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 vs 2 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2053 vs 1836 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3582 vs 2394 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 823 vs 746 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1743 vs 1353 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 46.136 vs 18.62 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.297 vs 0.188 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.273 vs 1.227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2169 vs 1910 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3711 vs 3385 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2169 vs 1910 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3711 vs 3385 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Celeron G4900
- Etwa 39% höhere Kerntemperatur: 100°C vs 72°C
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht einen leistungsfähigeren, aber dennoch kühleren laufenden Prozessor: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 64 GB vs 32 GB
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.011 vs 2.614
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 6.512 vs 3.137
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1013 vs 870
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1013 vs 870
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 100°C vs 72°C |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 64 GB vs 32 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.011 vs 2.614 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.512 vs 3.137 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1013 vs 870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1013 vs 870 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core i3-4170
CPU 2: Intel Celeron G4900
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i3-4170 | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2053 | 1836 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3582 | 2394 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 823 | 746 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1743 | 1353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.614 | 7.011 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 46.136 | 18.62 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.297 | 0.188 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.273 | 1.227 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.137 | 6.512 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 870 | 1013 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2169 | 1910 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3711 | 3385 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 870 | 1013 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2169 | 1910 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3711 | 3385 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Core i3-4170 | Intel Celeron G4900 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Haswell | Coffee Lake |
| Startdatum | Q1'15 | January 2018 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1940 | 1963 |
| Processor Number | i3-4170 | G4900 |
| Serie | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i3 Processors | Intel® Celeron® Processor G Series |
| Status | Discontinued | Launched |
| Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Jetzt kaufen | $58.80 | |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 16.38 | |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 3.70 GHz | 3.10 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | 8 GT/s DMI3 |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 72°C | 100°C |
| Anzahl der Adern | 2 | 2 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 2 |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | |
| L3 Cache | 6144 KB (shared) | |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 72 °C | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.1 GHz | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 25.6 GB/s | 37.5 GB/s |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V | DDR4-2400 |
Grafik |
||
| Device ID | 0x41E | 0x3E93 |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.15 GHz | 1.05 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 2 GB | 64 GB |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel® HD Graphics 4400 | Intel® UHD Graphics 610 |
| Intel® Clear Video Technologie | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | 3 |
| VGA | ||
Grafik-Bildqualität |
||
| Maximale Auflösung über DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über eDP | 3840x2160@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | 4096x2304@24Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | |
| Unterstützung von 4K-Auflösungen | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 11.1/12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCLGA1150 | FCLGA1151 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 54 Watt | 54 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2013C | PCG 2015C (65W) |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express Revision | Up to 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Core i3-4170 mit anderen
IntelCore i3-4170 vs
IntelCore i5-3450S
IntelCore i3-4170 vs
AMDA8-5500
IntelCore i3-4170 vs
IntelCore i3-4330
IntelCore i3-4170 vs
AMDRyzen 5 1400
IntelCore i3-4170 vs
IntelCeleron G4900
IntelCore i3-4170 vs
AMDA8-6500T
