Intel Core i5-5250U vs Intel Core M-5Y10c
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core i5-5250U und Intel Core M-5Y10c Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Grafik-Bildqualität, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i5-5250U
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 35% höhere Taktfrequenz: 2.70 GHz vs 2.00 GHz
- Etwa 11% höhere Kerntemperatur: 105°C vs 95 °C
- Etwa 35% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1515 vs 1119
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 2443 vs 1906
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 578 vs 471
- Etwa 27% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1247 vs 981
- Etwa 54% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1320 vs 857
- Etwa 39% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2237 vs 1613
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3322 vs 2750
- Etwa 54% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1320 vs 857
- Etwa 39% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2237 vs 1613
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3322 vs 2750
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 5 January 2015 vs 1 December 2014 |
| Maximale Frequenz | 2.70 GHz vs 2.00 GHz |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 105°C vs 95 °C |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1515 vs 1119 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2443 vs 1906 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 578 vs 471 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1247 vs 981 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1320 vs 857 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2237 vs 1613 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3322 vs 2750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1320 vs 857 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2237 vs 1613 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3322 vs 2750 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core M-5Y10c
- Etwa {Prozent}% mehr L3 Cache; weitere Daten können im Cache L3 gespeichert werden, um später schnell darauf zugreifen zu können
- 3x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 4.5 Watt vs 15 Watt
- 6.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.294 vs 1.806
- 3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 99.709 vs 33.387
- 2.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.643 vs 0.231
- 8.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 7.247 vs 0.885
- 6.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 14.666 vs 2.219
| Spezifikationen | |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB vs 3 MB |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 4.5 Watt vs 15 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.294 vs 1.806 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 99.709 vs 33.387 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.643 vs 0.231 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.247 vs 0.885 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 14.666 vs 2.219 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-5250U
CPU 2: Intel Core M-5Y10c
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i5-5250U | Intel Core M-5Y10c |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1515 | 1119 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2443 | 1906 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 578 | 471 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1247 | 981 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.806 | 12.294 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 33.387 | 99.709 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.231 | 0.643 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.885 | 7.247 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.219 | 14.666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1320 | 857 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2237 | 1613 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3322 | 2750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1320 | 857 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2237 | 1613 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3322 | 2750 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Core i5-5250U | Intel Core M-5Y10c | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Broadwell | Broadwell |
| Startdatum | 5 January 2015 | 1 December 2014 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $315 | $281 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1965 | 1966 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $441.89 | $281 |
| Prozessornummer | i5-5250U | 5Y10c |
| Serie | 5th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors | 5th Generation Intel® Core™ M Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 2.39 | 2.95 |
| Vertikales Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Basistaktfrequenz | 1.60 GHz | 800 MHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
| Matrizengröße | 133 mm | 82 mm |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 105 °C | |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 105°C | 95 °C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 2.70 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 2 | 2 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1900 Million | 1300 Million |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3L 1333/1600, LPDDR3 1600/1866 | LPDDR3 1333/1600; DDR3L/DDR3L-RS 1600 |
Grafik |
||
| Device ID | 0x1626 | 0x161E |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 950 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 950 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technologie | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel® HD Graphics 6000 | Intel® HD Graphics 5300 |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | 3 |
| Unterstützung für Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Grafik-Bildqualität |
||
| Maximale Auflösung über DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | 2560x1600@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über HDMI 1.4 | 2560X1600@60Hz | 2560x1600@60Hz |
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 11.2/12 | 11.2/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 9.5 W | 3.5 W |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 600 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Gehäusegröße | 40mm x24mm x 1.3mm | 30mm x 16.5mm |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCBGA1168 | FCBGA1234 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 4.5 Watt |
| Configurable TDP-up | 6 W | |
| Configurable TDP-up Frequency | 1.00 GHz | |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 3.5 W | |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 12 | 12 |
| PCI Express Revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 4x1, 2x4 | x1 (6), x2 (4), x4 (3) |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® Smart Response Technologie | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Plattform-Berechtigung | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Core i5-5250U mit anderen
IntelCore i5-5250U vs
IntelCeleron 2957U
IntelCore i5-5250U vs
IntelCore i5-4278U
IntelCore i5-5250U vs
IntelCore M-5Y10c
IntelCore i5-5250U vs
AMDGX-424CC
IntelCore i5-5250U vs
AMDRX-225FB
IntelCore i5-5250U vs
AMDR-272F
