Intel Core i5-5250U vs Intel Core i5-4278U
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core i5-5250U und Intel Core i5-4278U Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Grafik-Bildqualität, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i5-5250U
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 5 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 5% höhere Kerntemperatur: 105°C vs 100 °C
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht einen leistungsfähigeren, aber dennoch kühleren laufenden Prozessor: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- Etwa 87% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 28 Watt
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1320 vs 1145
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2237 vs 2044
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1320 vs 1145
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2237 vs 2044
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 5 January 2015 vs 21 July 2014 |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 105°C vs 100 °C |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 28 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1320 vs 1145 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2237 vs 2044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1320 vs 1145 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2237 vs 2044 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i5-4278U
- Etwa 15% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.10 GHz vs 2.70 GHz
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1706 vs 1514
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 2818 vs 2440
- Etwa 19% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 687 vs 578
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1505 vs 1247
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.179 vs 1.806
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 35.732 vs 33.387
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.258 vs 0.231
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.045 vs 0.885
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.564 vs 2.219
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.10 GHz vs 2.70 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1706 vs 1514 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2818 vs 2440 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 687 vs 578 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1505 vs 1247 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.179 vs 1.806 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 35.732 vs 33.387 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.258 vs 0.231 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.045 vs 0.885 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.564 vs 2.219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 vs 3322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 vs 3322 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-5250U
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-4278U
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i5-5250U | Intel Core i5-4278U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1514 | 1706 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2440 | 2818 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 578 | 687 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1247 | 1505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.806 | 2.179 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 33.387 | 35.732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.231 | 0.258 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.885 | 1.045 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.219 | 2.564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1320 | 1145 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2237 | 2044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3322 | 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1320 | 1145 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2237 | 2044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3322 | 3331 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Core i5-5250U | Intel Core i5-4278U | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Broadwell | Haswell |
| Startdatum | 5 January 2015 | 21 July 2014 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $315 | $315 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1967 | 1969 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $441.89 | |
| Processor Number | i5-5250U | i5-4278U |
| Serie | 5th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 2.39 | |
| Vertikales Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 1.60 GHz | 2.60 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | 5 GT/s DMI2 |
| Matrizengröße | 133 mm | 181 mm |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 105 °C | |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 105°C | 100 °C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 2.70 GHz | 3.10 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 2 | 2 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1900 Million | 1300 Million |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3L 1333/1600, LPDDR3 1600/1866 | DDR3L-1333, 1600; LPDDR3-1333, 1600 |
Grafik |
||
| Device ID | 0x1626 | 0xA2E |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 950 MHz | 1.10 GHz |
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 950 MHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technologie | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 16 GB | 2 GB |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel® HD Graphics 6000 | Intel® Iris® Graphics 5100 |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | 3 |
| Unterstützung für Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Grafik-Bildqualität |
||
| Maximale Auflösung über DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | 3200x2000@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über HDMI 1.4 | 2560X1600@60Hz | 3280x2000@60Hz |
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 11.2/12 | 11.2/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 9.5 W | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 600 MHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 40mm x24mm x 1.3mm | 40mm x 24mm x 1.5mm |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCBGA1168 | FCBGA1168 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 28 Watt |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 12 | 12 |
| PCI Express Revision | 2.0 | 2 |
| PCIe configurations | 4x1, 2x4 | 4x1, 2x4 |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® Smart Response Technologie | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Core i5-5250U mit anderen
IntelCore i5-5250U vs
IntelCeleron 2957U
IntelCore i5-5250U vs
IntelCore i5-4278U
IntelCore i5-5250U vs
IntelCore M-5Y10c
IntelCore i5-5250U vs
AMDGX-424CC
IntelCore i5-5250U vs
AMDRX-225FB
IntelCore i5-5250U vs
AMDR-272F
