Intel Core m7-6Y75 vs Intel Core i7-5600U
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core m7-6Y75 und Intel Core i7-5600U Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Grafik-Bildqualität, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core m7-6Y75
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 7 Monat(e) später
- 3x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 4.5 Watt vs 15 Watt
- 4.1x bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 2859 vs 700
- 3.4x bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 5114 vs 1503
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 1 September 2015 vs 5 January 2015 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 4.5 Watt vs 15 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 2859 vs 700 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 5114 vs 1503 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i7-5600U
- Etwa 3% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.20 GHz vs 3.10 GHz
- Etwa 5% höhere Kerntemperatur: 105°C vs 100°C
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1760 vs 1362
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 3015 vs 2364
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.244 vs 2.078
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 39.132 vs 33.362
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.299 vs 0.245
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.037 vs 0.849
- Etwa 67% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.801 vs 1.682
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1168 vs 1017
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1977 vs 1892
- 2.8x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3342 vs 1203
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1168 vs 1017
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1977 vs 1892
- 2.8x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3342 vs 1203
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.20 GHz vs 3.10 GHz |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 105°C vs 100°C |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1760 vs 1362 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3015 vs 2364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.244 vs 2.078 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 39.132 vs 33.362 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.299 vs 0.245 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.037 vs 0.849 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.801 vs 1.682 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1168 vs 1017 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1977 vs 1892 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 vs 1203 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1168 vs 1017 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1977 vs 1892 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 vs 1203 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core m7-6Y75
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-5600U
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core m7-6Y75 | Intel Core i7-5600U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1362 | 1760 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2364 | 3015 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 2859 | 700 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 5114 | 1503 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.078 | 2.244 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 33.362 | 39.132 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.245 | 0.299 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.849 | 1.037 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.682 | 2.801 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1017 | 1168 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1892 | 1977 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1203 | 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1017 | 1168 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1892 | 1977 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1203 | 3342 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Core m7-6Y75 | Intel Core i7-5600U | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Skylake | Broadwell |
| Startdatum | 1 September 2015 | 5 January 2015 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $393 | $393 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1956 | 1958 |
| Prozessornummer | M7-6Y75 | i7-5600U |
| Serie | 6th Generation Intel® Core™ m Processors | 5th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Vertikales Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Basistaktfrequenz | 1.20 GHz | 2.60 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 4 GT/s OPI | 5 GT/s DMI2 |
| Matrizengröße | 99 mm | 82 mm |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 100°C | 105°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.10 GHz | 3.20 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 2 | 2 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 105 °C | |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1300 Million | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 29.8 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | DDR3L 1333/1600, LPDDR3 1333/1600 |
Grafik |
||
| Device ID | 0x191E | 0x1616 |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.00 GHz | 950 MHz |
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 1 GHz | 950 MHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technologie | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel® HD Graphics 515 | Intel® HD Graphics 5500 |
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | 3 |
| Unterstützung für Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Grafik-Bildqualität |
||
| Unterstützung von 4K-Auflösungen | ||
| Maximale Auflösung über DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über eDP | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Maximale Auflösung über HDMI 1.4 | 4096@2304@24Hz | 2560x1600@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über WiDi | 1080p | |
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 3.5 W | 7.5 W |
| Configurable TDP-up | 7 W | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Gehäusegröße | 20mm X 16.5mm | 40mm x 24mm x 1.3mm |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCBGA1515 | FCBGA1168 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 4.5 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 600 MHz | |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 10 | 12 |
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 | 4x1, 2x4 |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® My WiFi Technologie | ||
| Intel® Smart Response Technologie | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Plattform-Berechtigung | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Core m7-6Y75 mit anderen
IntelCore m7-6Y75 vs
IntelCore i7-5600U
IntelCore m7-6Y75 vs
IntelCore i7-7920HQ
IntelCore m7-6Y75 vs
AMDGX-424CC
IntelCore m7-6Y75 vs
AMDRX-225FB
IntelCore m7-6Y75 vs
AMDR-272F
IntelCore m7-6Y75 vs
IntelPentium N6415
