AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP vs AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP und AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Jahr(e) 2 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 26% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1168 MHz vs 926 MHz
- Etwa 6% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1284 MHz vs 1206 MHz
- Etwa 6% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 7000 MHz vs 6600 MHz
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34598 vs 33787
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 122.268 vs 111.543
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1890.261 vs 1817.005
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.121 vs 9.511
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.008 vs 99.875
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 625.621 vs 511.362
- Etwa 52% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 2443
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 1674
- Etwa 52% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 2443
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 1674
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 849 vs 842
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 15 October 2018 vs 4 August 2016 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1168 MHz vs 926 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1284 MHz vs 1206 MHz |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 7000 MHz vs 6600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34598 vs 33787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 122.268 vs 111.543 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 vs 1817.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 vs 9.511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.008 vs 99.875 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 625.621 vs 511.362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 vs 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 vs 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 1674 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 849 vs 842 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
- Etwa 25% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 120 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7965 vs 7657
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 723 vs 676
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9983 vs 9258
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9983 vs 9258
Spezifikationen | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7965 vs 7657 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 723 vs 676 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 vs 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 vs 9258 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7657 | 7965 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 | 723 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34598 | 33787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 122.268 | 111.543 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 | 1817.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 | 9.511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.008 | 99.875 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 625.621 | 511.362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9258 | 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9258 | 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 1674 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 849 | 842 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Codename | Polaris 20 | Ellesmere |
Startdatum | 15 October 2018 | 4 August 2016 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 358 | 389 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
GCN-Generierung | 4th Gen | |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $179 | |
Jetzt kaufen | $109.99 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 100.00 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1284 MHz | 1206 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1168 MHz | 926 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 150 Watt | 120 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 5,700 million | 5,700 million |
Berechnungseinheiten | 32 | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 4.9 TFLOPs | |
GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
Leitungssysteme | 2048 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texturfüllrate | 154.4 GTexel / s | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 241 mm | 241 mm |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Überbrückungsfreies CrossFire | ||
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Speichertaktfrequenz | 7000 MHz | 6600 MHz |
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 211 GB/s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |