AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP versus AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP and AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 26% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1168 MHz versus 926 MHz
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1284 MHz versus 1206 MHz
- Environ 6% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 6600 MHz
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 34598 versus 33787
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 122.268 versus 111.543
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1890.261 versus 1817.005
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.121 versus 9.511
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.008 versus 99.875
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 625.621 versus 511.362
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 versus 2443
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 versus 1674
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 versus 2443
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 versus 1674
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 849 versus 842
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 15 October 2018 versus 4 August 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1168 MHz versus 926 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1284 MHz versus 1206 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 6600 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34598 versus 33787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 122.268 versus 111.543 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 versus 1817.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 versus 9.511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.008 versus 99.875 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 625.621 versus 511.362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 versus 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 versus 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 1674 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 849 versus 842 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7965 versus 7657
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 723 versus 676
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9983 versus 9258
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9983 versus 9258
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7965 versus 7657 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 723 versus 676 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 versus 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 versus 9258 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7657 | 7965 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 | 723 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34598 | 33787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 122.268 | 111.543 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 | 1817.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 | 9.511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.008 | 99.875 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 625.621 | 511.362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9258 | 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9258 | 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 1674 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 849 | 842 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | Polaris 20 | Ellesmere |
Date de sortie | 15 October 2018 | 4 August 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 358 | 389 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | |
Prix maintenant | $109.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 100.00 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1284 MHz | 1206 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1168 MHz | 926 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 120 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 5,700 million |
Unités de Compute | 32 | |
Performance á point flottant | 4.9 TFLOPs | |
GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
Pipelines | 2048 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 154.4 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 241 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 6600 MHz |
RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 211 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |