AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient vs AMD Radeon R7 M370
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient und AMD Radeon R7 M370 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Jahr(e) 11 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 15% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1100 MHz vs 960 MHz
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Etwa 34% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1894 vs 1418
- Etwa 51% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.039 vs 17.26
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.666 vs 1.653
- Etwa 93% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 135.437 vs 70.174
- Etwa 38% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2408 vs 1747
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3170 vs 1484
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 2449
- Etwa 38% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2408 vs 1747
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3170 vs 1484
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 2449
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 23 April 2018 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1100 MHz vs 960 MHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1894 vs 1418 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 vs 17.26 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.666 vs 1.653 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 vs 70.174 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2408 vs 1747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 vs 1484 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 2449 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2408 vs 1747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 vs 1484 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 2449 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R7 M370
- 3x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 900 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Etwa 90% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 676 vs 355
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 476.075 vs 176.928
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.082 vs 27.603
| Spezifikationen | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 900 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 vs 355 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 476.075 vs 176.928 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.082 vs 27.603 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M370
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | AMD Radeon R7 M370 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1894 | 1418 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 | 676 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 | 17.26 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 176.928 | 476.075 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.666 | 1.653 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.603 | 30.082 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 | 70.174 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2408 | 1747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 | 1484 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 2449 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2408 | 1747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 | 1484 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 2449 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 862 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7070 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | AMD Radeon R7 M370 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Codename | Raven | Litho |
| Startdatum | 23 April 2018 | 5 May 2015 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 931 | 933 |
| Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1100 MHz | 960 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 300 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 4,940 million | 1,040 million |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 737.3 gflops | |
| Leitungssysteme | 384 | |
| Texturfüllrate | 23.04 GTexel / s | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | |
| Busunterstützung | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop-Größe | medium sized | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | |
| Speicherbandbreite | 73.6 GB / s | |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 bit | |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 1000 MHz | |
| Speichertyp | GDDR5 | |
| Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PCIe 3.0 | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
| Zero Core | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
