AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient versus AMD Radeon R7 M370
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient and AMD Radeon R7 M370 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 15% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1100 MHz versus 960 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1894 versus 1418
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.039 versus 17.26
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.666 versus 1.653
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 135.437 versus 70.174
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2408 versus 1747
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3170 versus 1484
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 versus 2449
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2408 versus 1747
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3170 versus 1484
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 versus 2449
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 April 2018 versus 5 May 2015 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz versus 960 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1894 versus 1418 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 versus 17.26 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.666 versus 1.653 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 versus 70.174 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2408 versus 1747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 versus 1484 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 versus 2449 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2408 versus 1747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 versus 1484 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 versus 2449 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 M370
- 3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 900 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 676 versus 355
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 476.075 versus 176.928
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.082 versus 27.603
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 900 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 versus 355 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 476.075 versus 176.928 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.082 versus 27.603 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M370
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | AMD Radeon R7 M370 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1894 | 1418 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 | 676 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 | 17.26 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 176.928 | 476.075 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.666 | 1.653 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.603 | 30.082 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 | 70.174 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2408 | 1747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 | 1484 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 2449 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2408 | 1747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 | 1484 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 2449 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 862 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7070 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | AMD Radeon R7 M370 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Raven | Litho |
| Date de sortie | 23 April 2018 | 5 May 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 931 | 933 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | 960 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 1,040 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 737.3 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 384 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.04 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 73.6 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1000 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PCIe 3.0 | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| Zero Core | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient avec des autres
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5300
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675M
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670M
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
AMDRadeon R7 M370
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded
