Intel UHD Graphics 730 vs Intel UHD Graphics 620
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel UHD Graphics 730 und Intel UHD Graphics 620 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel UHD Graphics 730
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 7 Jahr(e) 9 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 13% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1300 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 8x mehr Leitungssysteme: 192 vs 24
- Etwa 51% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1573 vs 1042
- Etwa 71% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 412 vs 241
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5967 vs 4592
- Etwa 74% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2429 vs 1397
- 5.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5221 vs 878
- Etwa 49% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 2227
- Etwa 74% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2429 vs 1397
- 5.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5221 vs 878
- Etwa 49% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 2227
- 9.7x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 603 vs 62
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 2021 vs 1 September 2017 |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1300 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Leitungssysteme | 192 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1573 vs 1042 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 412 vs 241 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5967 vs 4592 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2429 vs 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 vs 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 vs 2227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2429 vs 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 vs 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 vs 2227 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 603 vs 62 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 730
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 620
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 730 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1573 | 1042 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 412 | 241 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5967 | 4592 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2429 | 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 | 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 2227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2429 | 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 | 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 2227 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 603 | 62 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
Intel UHD Graphics 730 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Generation 12.1 | Generation 9.5 |
Codename | Rocket Lake GT1 | Kaby Lake GT2 |
Startdatum | 2021 | 1 September 2017 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 633 | 1380 |
Typ | Desktop | Laptop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1300 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Berechnungseinheiten | 24 | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 998.4 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 192 | 24 |
Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 15.60 GTexel/s | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 189 million | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 1 | 1 |
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 32 GB | |
Speichertyp | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | |
Technologien |
||
Quick Sync |