Intel UHD Graphics 730 vs Intel UHD Graphics 620
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 730 and Intel UHD Graphics 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 730
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 192 vs 24
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1573 vs 1042
- Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 412 vs 241
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5967 vs 4592
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2429 vs 1397
- 5.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5221 vs 878
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 2227
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2429 vs 1397
- 5.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5221 vs 878
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 2227
- 9.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 603 vs 62
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2021 vs 1 September 2017 |
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1573 vs 1042 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 412 vs 241 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5967 vs 4592 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2429 vs 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 vs 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 vs 2227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2429 vs 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 vs 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 vs 2227 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 603 vs 62 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 730
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 620
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 730 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1573 | 1042 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 412 | 241 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5967 | 4592 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2429 | 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 | 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 2227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2429 | 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 | 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 2227 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 603 | 62 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 730 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Generation 9.5 |
| Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | Kaby Lake GT2 |
| Launch date | 2021 | 1 September 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 633 | 1380 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Compute units | 24 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 998.4 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 192 | 24 |
| Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 15.60 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | 1 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | |
| Memory type | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 730 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1300
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
ATIFireGL V3100
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1500M
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
ATIRadeon X1600 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
ATIFirePro V9800
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 500M
