Intel UHD Graphics 730 versus Intel UHD Graphics 620
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 730 and Intel UHD Graphics 620 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 730
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 13% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1300 MHz versus 1150 MHz
- 8x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 24
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1573 versus 1042
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 412 versus 241
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5967 versus 4592
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2429 versus 1397
- 5.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5221 versus 878
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 versus 2227
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2429 versus 1397
- 5.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5221 versus 878
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 versus 2227
- 9.7x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 603 versus 62
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2021 versus 1 September 2017 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz versus 1150 MHz |
| Pipelines | 192 versus 24 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1573 versus 1042 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 412 versus 241 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5967 versus 4592 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2429 versus 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 versus 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 versus 2227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2429 versus 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 versus 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 versus 2227 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 603 versus 62 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 730
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 620
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 730 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1573 | 1042 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 412 | 241 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5967 | 4592 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2429 | 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 | 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 2227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2429 | 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 | 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 2227 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 603 | 62 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 730 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Generation 9.5 |
| Nom de code | Rocket Lake GT1 | Kaby Lake GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 2021 | 1 September 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 633 | 1380 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 24 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 998.4 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 192 | 24 |
| Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.60 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 1 |
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | |
| Genre de mémoire | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 730 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1300
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
ATIFireGL V3100
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1500M
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
ATIRadeon X1600 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
ATIFirePro V9800
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 500M
