NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 und NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Jahr(e) 2 Monat(e) später
- 2.2x mehr Texturfüllrate: 14.43 GTexel / s vs 6.5 billion / sec
- 8x mehr Leitungssysteme: 384 vs 48
- 4.5x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 692.7 gflops vs 155.5 gflops
- 1600x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 1600 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 830 vs 322
- Etwa 93% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 vs 131
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2902 vs 1283
- 4.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.872 vs 2.471
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 166.832 vs 77.99
- 3.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.817 vs 0.233
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.415 vs 6.018
- 9.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 36.916 vs 4.053
- 3.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1951 vs 555
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1693 vs 835
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3324 vs 1155
- 3.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1951 vs 555
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1693 vs 835
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3324 vs 1155
- 3.8x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 327 vs 87
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 18 June 2014 vs 2 April 2012 |
| Texturfüllrate | 14.43 GTexel / s vs 6.5 billion / sec |
| Leitungssysteme | 384 vs 48 |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 692.7 gflops vs 155.5 gflops |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 1600 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 vs 322 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 vs 131 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 vs 1283 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 vs 2.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 vs 77.99 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 vs 0.233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 vs 6.018 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 vs 4.053 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 vs 555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 vs 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 vs 1155 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 vs 555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 vs 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 vs 1155 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 vs 87 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
- Etwa 16% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:810 MHz vs 700 MHz
- Etwa 69% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 29 Watt vs 49 Watt
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 810 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 29 Watt vs 49 Watt |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | 322 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 131 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 | 1283 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | 2.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | 77.99 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | 0.233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | 6.018 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | 4.053 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | 555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 1155 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | 555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 1155 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 | 87 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Fermi | Fermi 2.0 |
| Codename | GF108 | GF119 |
| Startdatum | 18 June 2014 | 2 April 2012 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $59.99 | $39.99 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1311 | 1626 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $54.99 | $39.99 |
| Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 20.48 | 10.13 |
Technische Info |
||
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 700 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 692.7 gflops | 155.5 gflops |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 384 | 48 |
| Texturfüllrate | 14.43 GTexel / s | 6.5 billion / sec |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 49 Watt | 29 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 585 million | 292 million |
| CUDA-Kerne | 48 | |
| Maximale GPU-Temperatur | 102 °C | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA |
| Audioeingang für HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximale VGA-Auflösung | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Länge | 145 mm | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | None |
| Busunterstützung | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Höhe | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 1 GB | 1024 MB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 40.1 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 1600 MHz | 1.8 GB/s |
| Speichertyp | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologien |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
