NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Monat(e) später
Startdatum | 30 April 2019 vs 14 March 2019 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Etwa 3% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1530 MHz vs 1485 MHz
- Etwa 7% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1785 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Etwa 48% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11659 vs 7881
- Etwa 38% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 776 vs 564
- Etwa 48% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 58014 vs 39165
- Etwa 41% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 189.842 vs 134.765
- Etwa 45% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1902.867 vs 1316.075
- Etwa 52% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.408 vs 8.799
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 116.183 vs 94.915
- Etwa 53% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 875.838 vs 573.418
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14998 vs 10959
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14998 vs 10959
- 3.5x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1065 vs 305
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1530 MHz vs 1485 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1785 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 8004 MHz vs 8000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11659 vs 7881 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 776 vs 564 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 58014 vs 39165 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 189.842 vs 134.765 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1902.867 vs 1316.075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.408 vs 8.799 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.183 vs 94.915 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 875.838 vs 573.418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 vs 10959 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 vs 10959 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1065 vs 305 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 | 11659 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 | 776 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 | 58014 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 | 189.842 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 | 1902.867 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 | 13.408 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 | 116.183 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 | 875.838 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | 14998 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | 14998 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 | 1065 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | Turing |
Codename | TU107 | TU116 |
Startdatum | 30 April 2019 | 14 March 2019 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $179 | $219 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 376 | 258 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz | 1785 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1485 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 120 Watt | |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 6,600 million | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort Anzahl | 1 | 1 |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | 1x 8-pin |
Länge | 229 mm | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Speicher |
||
Speichertaktfrequenz | 8000 MHz | 8004 MHz |