NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER und Intel UHD Graphics 630 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Jahr(e) 1 Monat(e) später
- 4.4x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 1530 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Etwa 49% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1785 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 5454.9x mehr Texturfüllrate: 157.1 GTexel/s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
- 58.7x mehr Leitungssysteme: 1408 vs 24
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 10.3x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12712 vs 1237
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 804 vs 299
- 13.5x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 62641 vs 4657
- 6.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 187.131 vs 27.517
- 7.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2548.187 vs 354.254
- 8.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 15.882 vs 1.807
- 5.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.673 vs 20.323
- 30.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 901.388 vs 29.327
- 9.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 vs 1870
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 1596
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3309
- 9.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 vs 1870
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 1596
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3309
- 18.8x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1278 vs 68
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 29 Oct 2019 vs 1 September 2017 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1530 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1785 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 157.1 GTexel/s vs 28.8 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 1408 vs 24 |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12712 vs 1237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 804 vs 299 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62641 vs 4657 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 vs 27.517 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 vs 354.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 vs 1.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 vs 20.323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 vs 29.327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 vs 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 vs 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3309 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1278 vs 68 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel UHD Graphics 630
- 8.3x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 125 Watt
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12712 | 1237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 804 | 299 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62641 | 4657 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 | 27.517 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 | 354.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 | 1.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 | 20.323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 | 29.327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 | 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 | 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3309 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1278 | 68 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | Generation 9.5 |
Codename | TU116 | Coffee Lake GT2 |
Startdatum | 29 Oct 2019 | 1 September 2017 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $229 | |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 223 | 1234 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1785 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1530 MHz | 350 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.027 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 1408 | 24 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.68 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 157.1 GTexel/s | 28.8 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 125 Watt | 15 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 6600 million | 189 million |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 460.8 gflops | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Länge | 9 inches (229 mm) | |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 8-pin | |
Breite | Dual-slot | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 6 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 336.0 GB/s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 192 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 1 | |
Technologien |
||
Quick Sync |