NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 8 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 2% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1530 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Etwa 1% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1785 MHz vs 1770 MHz
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 62606 vs 60872
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 vs 16952
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 vs 16952
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 29 Oct 2019 vs 22 February 2019 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1530 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1785 MHz vs 1770 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62606 vs 60872 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 vs 16952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 vs 16952 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Etwa 4% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 120 Watt vs 125 Watt
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12906 vs 12726
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 208.608 vs 187.131
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2573.643 vs 2548.187
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.447 vs 15.882
- Etwa 24% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.886 vs 117.673
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 926.614 vs 901.388
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6273 vs 5993
Spezifikationen | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12906 vs 12726 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 807 vs 805 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 vs 187.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 vs 2548.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 vs 15.882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 vs 117.673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 vs 901.388 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6273 vs 5993 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12726 | 12906 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 805 | 807 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62606 | 60872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 | 208.608 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 | 2573.643 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 | 16.447 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 | 145.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 | 926.614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 | 16952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 | 16952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5993 | 6273 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | Turing |
Codename | TU116 | TU116 |
Startdatum | 29 Oct 2019 | 22 February 2019 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $229 | $279 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 213 | 210 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Jetzt kaufen | $279.99 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 67.32 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1785 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1530 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.027 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 1408 | |
Pixel fill rate | 85.68 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 157.1 GTexel/s | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 125 Watt | 120 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 6600 million | 6,600 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort Anzahl | 1 | |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 9 inches (229 mm) | 229 mm |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Breite | Dual-slot | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 6 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 336.0 GB/s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 192 bit | |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 12000 MHz |