NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- Etwa 62% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1320 MHz vs 817 MHz
- Etwa 39% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1777 MHz vs 1282 MHz
- Etwa 29% höhere Texturfüllrate: 199.0 GTexel/s vs 153.8 GTexel/s
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 12 GB vs 6 GB
- Etwa 25% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17107 vs 13387
- Etwa 65% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 vs 589
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 88335 vs 79058
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4024.711 vs 3898.264
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 28.79 vs 27.109
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 187.542 vs 155.642
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22495 vs 21278
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22495 vs 21278
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8755 vs 8234
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1320 MHz vs 817 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1777 MHz vs 1282 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 199.0 GTexel/s vs 153.8 GTexel/s |
Maximale Speichergröße | 12 GB vs 6 GB |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 vs 13387 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 vs 589 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88335 vs 79058 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4024.711 vs 3898.264 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.79 vs 27.109 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 187.542 vs 155.642 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 vs 21278 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 vs 21278 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8755 vs 8234 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
- Etwa 7% höhere Leitungssysteme: 3840 vs 3584
- 2.8x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 60 Watt vs 170 Watt
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 339.841 vs 304.563
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1167.569 vs 1141.654
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8913 vs 3717
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8054 vs 3356
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8913 vs 3717
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8054 vs 3356
Spezifikationen | |
Leitungssysteme | 3840 vs 3584 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 339.841 vs 304.563 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1167.569 vs 1141.654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8913 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8913 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 vs 3356 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 | 13387 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 | 589 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88335 | 79058 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 304.563 | 339.841 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4024.711 | 3898.264 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.79 | 27.109 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 187.542 | 155.642 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.654 | 1167.569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 | 21278 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 8913 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 8054 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 | 21278 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 8913 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 8054 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8755 | 8234 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Ampere |
Codename | GA106 | GA106 |
Startdatum | 12 Jan 2021 | 12 Jan 2021 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $329 | |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 127 | 130 |
Typ | Desktop | Laptop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1777 MHz | 1282 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1320 MHz | 817 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | 153.8 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) | 9.846 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS | 9.846 TFLOPS |
Leitungssysteme | 3584 | 3840 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.30 GPixel/s | 61.54 GPixel/s |
Texturfüllrate | 199.0 GTexel/s | 153.8 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 170 Watt | 60 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 13250 million | 12000 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Portable Device Dependent |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Länge | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | None |
Breite | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Laptop-Größe | large | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 12 GB | 6 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 360 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 192 bit | 192 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologien |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |