NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 4 Monat(e) später
- 2.8x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 115 Watt vs 320 Watt
- Etwa 47% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 190.723 vs 175.219
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 9367 vs 3716
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8604 vs 3356
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 9367 vs 3716
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8604 vs 3356
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 12 Jan 2021 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 320 Watt |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.723 vs 175.219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 9367 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8604 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 9367 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8604 vs 3356 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- Etwa 30% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1440 MHz vs 1110 MHz
- Etwa 11% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1710 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Etwa 57% höhere Texturfüllrate: 465.1 GTexel/s vs 296.6 GTexel/s
- Etwa 42% höhere Leitungssysteme: 8704 vs 6144
- Um etwa 25% höhere maximale Speichergröße: 10 GB vs 8 GB
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 457.414 vs 371.785
- Etwa 70% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6022.79 vs 3552.807
- Etwa 64% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.221 vs 31.212
- Etwa 67% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2381.93 vs 1422.602
- Etwa 31% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34537 vs 26295
- Etwa 31% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34537 vs 26295
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1440 MHz vs 1110 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1710 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 465.1 GTexel/s vs 296.6 GTexel/s |
Leitungssysteme | 8704 vs 6144 |
Maximale Speichergröße | 10 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 vs 371.785 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 vs 3552.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 vs 31.212 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 vs 1422.602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 vs 26295 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 vs 26295 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 371.785 | 457.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3552.807 | 6022.79 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.212 | 51.221 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.723 | 175.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1422.602 | 2381.93 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26295 | 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 9367 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8604 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26295 | 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 9367 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8604 | 3356 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25323 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1041 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 167585 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17706 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Ampere |
Codename | GA104 | GA102 |
Startdatum | 12 Jan 2021 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 93 | 52 |
Typ | Laptop | Desktop |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $699 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1545 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1110 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS (1:64) | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS (1:1) | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | 29.77 TFLOPS |
Leitungssysteme | 6144 | 8704 |
Pixel fill rate | 148.3 GPixel/s | 164.2 GPixel/s |
Texturfüllrate | 296.6 GTexel/s | 465.1 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 115 Watt | 320 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 17400 million | 28300 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Höhe | PCIe 4.0 x16 | 40 mm, 1.6 inches |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | 1x 12-pin |
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | |
Länge | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Breite | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 10 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 448.0 GB/s | 760.3 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 320 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
Technologien |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |