NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- 2.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 115 Watt versus 320 Watt
- Environ 47% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 190.723 versus 175.219
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 9367 versus 3716
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8604 versus 3356
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 9367 versus 3716
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8604 versus 3356
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 versus 1 Sep 2020 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt versus 320 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.723 versus 175.219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 9367 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8604 versus 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 9367 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8604 versus 3356 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- Environ 30% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1440 MHz versus 1110 MHz
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1710 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Environ 57% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 465.1 GTexel/s versus 296.6 GTexel/s
- Environ 42% de pipelines plus haut: 8704 versus 6144
- Environ 25% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 10 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 457.414 versus 371.785
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6022.79 versus 3552.807
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 52.383 versus 31.212
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2381.93 versus 1422.602
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34537 versus 26295
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34537 versus 26295
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1440 MHz versus 1110 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1710 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 465.1 GTexel/s versus 296.6 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 8704 versus 6144 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 10 GB versus 8 GB |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 versus 371.785 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 versus 3552.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 52.383 versus 31.212 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 versus 1422.602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 versus 26295 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 versus 26295 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 371.785 | 457.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3552.807 | 6022.79 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.212 | 52.383 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.723 | 175.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1422.602 | 2381.93 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26295 | 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 9367 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8604 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26295 | 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 9367 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8604 | 3356 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25330 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1041 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 167986 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17695 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Nom de code | GA104 | GA102 |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 92 | 52 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1110 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS (1:64) | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS (1:1) | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | 29.77 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 6144 | 8704 |
Pixel fill rate | 148.3 GPixel/s | 164.2 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 296.6 GTexel/s | 465.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 320 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 28300 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | PCIe 4.0 x16 | 40 mm, 1.6 inches |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 12-pin |
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Longeur | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Largeur | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 10 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448.0 GB/s | 760.3 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 320 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |