NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 4 Monat(e) später
- 3x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 115 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Etwa 44% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 9367 vs 3713
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8604 vs 3354
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 9367 vs 3713
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8604 vs 3354
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 12 Jan 2021 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 9367 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8604 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 9367 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8604 vs 3354 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Etwa 26% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1395 MHz vs 1110 MHz
- Etwa 10% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1695 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Etwa 87% höhere Texturfüllrate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 296.6 GTexel/s
- Etwa 71% höhere Leitungssysteme: 10496 vs 6144
- 3x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 24 GB vs 8 GB
- Etwa 97% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 732.196 vs 371.785
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 vs 3552.807
- 2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 63.011 vs 31.212
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.569 vs 190.723
- Etwa 72% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 vs 1422.602
- Etwa 27% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 26295
- Etwa 27% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 26295
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1395 MHz vs 1110 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1695 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 296.6 GTexel/s |
Leitungssysteme | 10496 vs 6144 |
Maximale Speichergröße | 24 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 732.196 vs 371.785 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 vs 3552.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 63.011 vs 31.212 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.569 vs 190.723 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 vs 1422.602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 vs 26295 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 vs 26295 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 371.785 | 732.196 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3552.807 | 7585.258 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.212 | 63.011 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.723 | 247.569 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1422.602 | 2441.384 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26295 | 33398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 9367 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8604 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26295 | 33398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 9367 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8604 | 3354 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26818 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 188320 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19875 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Ampere |
Codename | GA104 | GA102 |
Startdatum | 12 Jan 2021 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 93 | 40 |
Typ | Laptop | Desktop |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $1499 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1545 MHz | 1695 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1110 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS (1:64) | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS (1:1) | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | 35.58 TFLOPS |
Leitungssysteme | 6144 | 10496 |
Pixel fill rate | 148.3 GPixel/s | 189.8 GPixel/s |
Texturfüllrate | 296.6 GTexel/s | 556.0 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 115 Watt | 350 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 17400 million | 28300 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Höhe | PCIe 4.0 x16 | 138 mm (5.4 inches) |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | 1x 12-pin |
Länge | 313 mm (12.3 inches) | |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Breite | Triple-slot | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 24 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 448.0 GB/s | 936.2 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 384 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
Technologien |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |