NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 115 Watt versus 350 Watt
- Environ 44% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective versus 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 9367 versus 3713
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8604 versus 3354
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 9367 versus 3713
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8604 versus 3354
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 versus 1 Sep 2020 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt versus 350 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective versus 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 9367 versus 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8604 versus 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 9367 versus 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8604 versus 3354 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Environ 26% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1395 MHz versus 1110 MHz
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1695 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Environ 87% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 556.0 GTexel/s versus 296.6 GTexel/s
- Environ 71% de pipelines plus haut: 10496 versus 6144
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 24 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 732.196 versus 371.785
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 versus 3552.807
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 63.011 versus 31.212
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.569 versus 190.723
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 versus 1422.602
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 versus 26295
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 versus 26295
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1395 MHz versus 1110 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1695 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 556.0 GTexel/s versus 296.6 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 10496 versus 6144 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 24 GB versus 8 GB |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 732.196 versus 371.785 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 versus 3552.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 63.011 versus 31.212 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.569 versus 190.723 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 versus 1422.602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 versus 26295 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 versus 26295 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 371.785 | 732.196 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3552.807 | 7585.258 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.212 | 63.011 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.723 | 247.569 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1422.602 | 2441.384 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26295 | 33398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 9367 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8604 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26295 | 33398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 9367 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8604 | 3354 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26815 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 188320 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19877 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Nom de code | GA104 | GA102 |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 93 | 40 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1499 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1695 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1110 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS (1:64) | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS (1:1) | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | 35.58 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 6144 | 10496 |
Pixel fill rate | 148.3 GPixel/s | 189.8 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 296.6 GTexel/s | 556.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 350 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 28300 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | PCIe 4.0 x16 | 138 mm (5.4 inches) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 12-pin |
Longeur | 313 mm (12.3 inches) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Largeur | Triple-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 24 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448.0 GB/s | 936.2 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 384 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |