NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 8 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 68% höhere Texturfüllrate: 532.8 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s
- Etwa 74% höhere Leitungssysteme: 10240 vs 5888
- Um etwa 50% höhere maximale Speichergröße: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 27039 vs 22319
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1087 vs 997
- Etwa 69% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 209081 vs 123479
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 497.768 vs 453.922
- Etwa 48% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 60.265 vs 40.757
- Etwa 44% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2390.028 vs 1664.554
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34770 vs 31716
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34770 vs 31716
- Etwa 45% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19741 vs 13659
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 31 May 2021 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
Texturfüllrate | 532.8 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s |
Leitungssysteme | 10240 vs 5888 |
Maximale Speichergröße | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27039 vs 22319 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1087 vs 997 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 vs 123479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 497.768 vs 453.922 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.265 vs 40.757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2390.028 vs 1664.554 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 vs 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 vs 31716 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19741 vs 13659 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Etwa 10% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1500 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Etwa 4% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1725 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Etwa 59% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 220 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Etwa 47% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- 8.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 vs 661.977
- Etwa 42% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 182.055 vs 128.381
- 3.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 vs 3718
- 9.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 vs 3359
- 3.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 vs 3718
- 9.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 vs 3359
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1500 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 220 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 vs 661.977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 vs 128.381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 vs 3359 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27039 | 22319 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1087 | 997 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 | 123479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 497.768 | 453.922 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.977 | 5803.174 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.265 | 40.757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 128.381 | 182.055 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2390.028 | 1664.554 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 31930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 31930 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19741 | 13659 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Ampere |
Codename | GA102 | GA104 |
Startdatum | 31 May 2021 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $1199 | $499 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 57 | 44 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1365 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 532.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS (1:1) | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS |
Leitungssysteme | 10240 | 5888 |
Pixel fill rate | 186.5 GPixel/s | 165.6 GPixel/s |
Texturfüllrate | 532.8 GTexel/s | 317.4 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 350 Watt | 220 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 28300 million | 17400 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Höhe | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Länge | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | 242 mm, 9.5 inches |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 750 Watt | 550 Watt |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Breite | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 912.4 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 384 bit | 256 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Speichertyp | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |