NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 und NVIDIA Quadro K2100M Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 5 Jahr(e) 0 Monat(e) später
- 2.4x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 1620 MHz vs 667 MHz
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.7x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 14000 MHz vs 3008 MHz
- 11.5x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15652 vs 1363
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 705 vs 287
- 23x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 vs 4566
- 21.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 270.203 vs 12.383
- 10.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3728.248 vs 358.892
- 24.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 26.999 vs 1.107
- 5.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 110.761 vs 21.761
- 33.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1370.281 vs 40.703
- 8.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 vs 2294
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 3605
- 8.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 vs 2294
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 3605
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 13 August 2018 vs 23 July 2013 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1620 MHz vs 667 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz vs 3008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15652 vs 1363 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 vs 287 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 vs 4566 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.203 vs 12.383 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.248 vs 358.892 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 26.999 vs 1.107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 110.761 vs 21.761 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1370.281 vs 40.703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 vs 2294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 vs 2294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3605 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
- 3.6x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 55 Watt vs 200 Watt
Spezifikationen | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 vs 3358 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | NVIDIA Quadro K2100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15652 | 1363 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 | 287 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 | 4566 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.203 | 12.383 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.248 | 358.892 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 26.999 | 1.107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 110.761 | 21.761 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1370.281 | 40.703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 | 2294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 | 2294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3362 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 | 0 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | NVIDIA Quadro K2100M | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | Kepler |
Codename | TU104 | GK106 |
Startdatum | 13 August 2018 | 23 July 2013 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $2,299 | $84.95 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 138 | 1101 |
Typ | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Jetzt kaufen | $159.99 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 10.91 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1815 MHz | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1620 MHz | 667 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 200 Watt | 55 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 13,600 million | 2,540 million |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 768.4 gflops | |
Leitungssysteme | 576 | |
Texturfüllrate | 32.02 GTexel / s | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Länge | 267 mm | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Laptop-Größe | medium sized | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz | 3008 MHz |
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 48.0 GB / s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |