NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 versus NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

versus

NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 0 mois plus tard
2.4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1620 MHz versus 667 MHz
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
4.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 3008 MHz
11.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 15652 versus 1363
2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 705 versus 287
23x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 versus 4566
21.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 270.203 versus 12.383
10.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3728.248 versus 358.892
24.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 26.999 versus 1.107
5.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 110.761 versus 21.761
33.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1370.281 versus 40.703
8.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 versus 2294
Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 versus 3605
8.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 versus 2294
Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 versus 3605

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	13 August 2018 versus 23 July 2013
Vitesse du noyau	1620 MHz versus 667 MHz
Processus de fabrication	12 nm versus 28 nm
Vitesse de mémoire	14000 MHz versus 3008 MHz
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	15652 versus 1363
PassMark - G2D Mark	705 versus 287
Geekbench - OpenCL	105171 versus 4566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	270.203 versus 12.383
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	3728.248 versus 358.892
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	26.999 versus 1.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	110.761 versus 21.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1370.281 versus 40.703
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	19811 versus 2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3719 versus 3605
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	19811 versus 2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3719 versus 3605

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

3.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 55 Watt versus 200 Watt

Caractéristiques
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt versus 200 Watt
Référence
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3362 versus 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3362 versus 3358

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

15652

1363

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

705

287

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

105171

4566

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

270.203

12.383

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3728.248

358.892

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

26.999

1.107

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

110.761

21.761

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1370.281

40.703

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19811

2294

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3719

3605

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3362

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19811

2294

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3719

3605

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3362

Nom	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000	NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
PassMark - G3D Mark	15652	1363
PassMark - G2D Mark	705	287
Geekbench - OpenCL	105171	4566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	270.203	12.383
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	3728.248	358.892
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	26.999	1.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	110.761	21.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1370.281	40.703
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	19811	2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3719	3605
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	19811	2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3719	3605
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3362
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	10685	0

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000	NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Essentiel
Architecture	Turing	Kepler
Nom de code	TU104	GK106
Date de sortie	13 August 2018	23 July 2013
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$2,299	$84.95
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	138	1101
Genre	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Prix maintenant		$159.99
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)		10.91
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1815 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	1620 MHz	667 MHz
Processus de fabrication	12 nm	28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	200 Watt	55 Watt
Compte de transistor	13,600 million	2,540 million
Performance á point flottant		768.4 gflops
Pipelines		576
Taux de remplissage de la texture		32.02 GTexel / s
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Longeur	267 mm
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Taille du laptop		medium sized
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model		5
Vulkan
Mémoire
Vitesse de mémoire	14000 MHz	3008 MHz
RAM maximale		2 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire		48.0 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire		128 Bit
Genre de mémoire		GDDR5
Mémoire partagé		0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus