NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• 2.4x more core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 667 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 4.7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 3008 MHz
• 11.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15652 vs 1363
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 705 vs 287
• 23x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 vs 4566
• 21.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 270.203 vs 12.383
• 10.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3728.248 vs 358.892
• 24.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 26.999 vs 1.107
• 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 110.761 vs 21.761
• 33.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1370.281 vs 40.703
• 8.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 vs 2294
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 3605
• 8.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 vs 2294
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 3605

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

• 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 200 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	15652 1363
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	705 287
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	105171 4566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	270.203 12.383
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3728.248 358.892
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26.999 1.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	110.761 21.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1370.281 40.703
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19811 2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3719 3605
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19811 2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3719 3605
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3362

Compare specifications (specs)