NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 und NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 4 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 17% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1440 MHz vs 1230 MHz
- Etwa 28% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1770 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- 8x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 14000 MHz vs 1752 MHz
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18872 vs 8260
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 791 vs 327
- Etwa 96% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19571 vs 9969
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3521
- Etwa 96% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19571 vs 9969
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3521
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 13 August 2018 vs 27 March 2018 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1440 MHz vs 1230 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1770 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz vs 1752 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18872 vs 8260 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 vs 327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19571 vs 9969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3521 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19571 vs 9969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3521 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 163779 vs 74179
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 592.008 vs 488.989
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 46.266 vs 41.461
- Etwa 77% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 271.318 vs 153.677
- Etwa 41% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2169.759 vs 1534.582
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 163779 vs 74179 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 592.008 vs 488.989 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 46.266 vs 41.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 271.318 vs 153.677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2169.759 vs 1534.582 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3357 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18872 | 8260 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 | 327 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74179 | 163779 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 | 592.008 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 | 46.266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.677 | 271.318 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 | 2169.759 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19571 | 9969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3521 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19571 | 9969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3521 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13943 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | Volta |
Codename | TU102 | GV100 |
Startdatum | 13 August 2018 | 27 March 2018 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $6,299 | |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 112 | 155 |
Typ | Workstation | Workstation |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1770 MHz | 1380 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1440 MHz | 1230 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 18,600 million | 21,100 million |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 14,131 gflops | |
Leitungssysteme | 5120 | |
Texturfüllrate | 441.6 GTexel / s | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 267 mm | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Speicher |
||
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz | 1752 MHz |
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 32 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 897.0 GB / s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 4096 Bit | |
Speichertyp | HBM2 |