NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA RTX A6000 und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA RTX A6000
- Etwa 3% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1455 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- Etwa 12% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1860 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- 2.5x mehr Texturfüllrate: 625.0 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s
- 2.2x mehr Leitungssysteme: 10752 vs 4864
- 6x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 48 GB vs 8 GB
- Etwa 14% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Etwa 78% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 193937 vs 109075
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 735.8 vs 323.141
- Etwa 66% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 58.523 vs 35.311
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 178.784 vs 150.943
- Etwa 59% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2342.233 vs 1477.456
- Etwa 53% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17833 vs 11689
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1455 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1860 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 625.0 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s |
Leitungssysteme | 10752 vs 4864 |
Maximale Speichergröße | 48 GB vs 8 GB |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 193937 vs 109075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 735.8 vs 323.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 58.523 vs 35.311 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 178.784 vs 150.943 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2342.233 vs 1477.456 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17833 vs 11689 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 50% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 200 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 4.8x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20470 vs 4237
- 11.5x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 86
- Etwa 19% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 23142
- Etwa 19% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 23142
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 1 Dec 2020 vs 5 Oct 2020 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20470 vs 4237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 vs 86 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 23142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 23142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3353 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4237 | 20470 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 86 | 989 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 193937 | 109075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 735.8 | 323.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 58.523 | 35.311 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 178.784 | 150.943 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2342.233 | 1477.456 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23142 | 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23142 | 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17833 | 11689 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4829.953 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Ampere |
Codename | GA102 | GA104 |
Startdatum | 5 Oct 2020 | 1 Dec 2020 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $4649 | $399 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 98 | 99 |
Typ | Desktop | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1860 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1455 MHz | 1410 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1250 GFLOPS (1:32) | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS (1:1) | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS | 16.20 TFLOPS |
Leitungssysteme | 10752 | 4864 |
Pixel fill rate | 208.3 GPixel/s | 133.2 GPixel/s |
Texturfüllrate | 625.0 GTexel/s | 253.1 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 300 Watt | 200 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 28300 million | 17400 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Länge | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 242 mm (9.5 inches) |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 700 Watt | 350 Watt |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 8-pin EPS | 1x 12-pin |
Breite | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 48 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 768 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 384 bit | 256 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |