NVIDIA RTX A6000 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A6000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A6000
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1455 MHz versus 1410 MHz
- Environ 12% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1860 MHz versus 1665 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 625.0 GTexel/s versus 253.1 GTexel/s
- 2.2x plus de pipelines: 10752 versus 4864
- 6x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 48 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 14% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 193937 versus 109075
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 735.8 versus 323.141
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 58.523 versus 35.311
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 178.784 versus 150.943
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2342.233 versus 1477.456
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17833 versus 11689
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1455 MHz versus 1410 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1860 MHz versus 1665 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 625.0 GTexel/s versus 253.1 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 10752 versus 4864 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 48 GB versus 8 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 193937 versus 109075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 735.8 versus 323.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 58.523 versus 35.311 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 178.784 versus 150.943 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2342.233 versus 1477.456 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17833 versus 11689 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 200 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 4.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 20469 versus 4237
- 11.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 versus 86
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 versus 23142
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 versus 23142
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 versus 5 Oct 2020 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt versus 300 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20469 versus 4237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 versus 86 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 versus 23142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 versus 23142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3353 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4237 | 20469 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 86 | 989 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 193937 | 109075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 735.8 | 323.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 58.523 | 35.311 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 178.784 | 150.943 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2342.233 | 1477.456 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23142 | 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23142 | 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17833 | 11689 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4829.953 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Nom de code | GA102 | GA104 |
Date de sortie | 5 Oct 2020 | 1 Dec 2020 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $4649 | $399 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 98 | 99 |
Genre | Desktop | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1860 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1455 MHz | 1410 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1250 GFLOPS (1:32) | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS (1:1) | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS | 16.20 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 10752 | 4864 |
Pixel fill rate | 208.3 GPixel/s | 133.2 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 625.0 GTexel/s | 253.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 200 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 17400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 242 mm (9.5 inches) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 700 Watt | 350 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 8-pin EPS | 1x 12-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 48 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 768 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |