AMD A10-6800K vs Intel Core i7-4765T
Comparative analysis of AMD A10-6800K and Intel Core i7-4765T processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics image quality, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A10-6800K
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- Around 47% higher clock speed: 4.4 GHz vs 3.00 GHz
- Around 12% higher maximum core temperature: 74°C vs 66.35°C
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1267 vs 1033
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4136 vs 1882
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4604 vs 4213
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1267 vs 1033
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4136 vs 1882
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4604 vs 4213
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
| Maximum frequency | 4.4 GHz vs 3.00 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 74°C vs 66.35°C |
| L2 cache | 4 MB vs 256 KB (per core) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1267 vs 1033 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4136 vs 1882 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4604 vs 4213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1267 vs 1033 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4136 vs 1882 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4604 vs 4213 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-4765T
- 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 32 nm SOI
- Around 33% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1626 vs 1596
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 5113 vs 3199
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 684 vs 542
- Around 68% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2511 vs 1494
- Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.433 vs 4.893
- 16.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 177.387 vs 10.547
- 5.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.239 vs 0.209
- 16.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.229 vs 0.604
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 13.193 vs 3.801
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of threads | 8 vs 4 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 32 nm SOI |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 192 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1626 vs 1596 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5113 vs 3199 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 684 vs 542 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2511 vs 1494 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.433 vs 4.893 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 177.387 vs 10.547 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.239 vs 0.209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.229 vs 0.604 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.193 vs 3.801 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A10-6800K
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-4765T
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD A10-6800K | Intel Core i7-4765T |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1596 | 1626 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3199 | 5113 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 542 | 684 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1494 | 2511 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.893 | 8.433 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 10.547 | 177.387 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.209 | 1.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.604 | 10.229 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.801 | 13.193 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1267 | 1033 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4136 | 1882 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4604 | 4213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1267 | 1033 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4136 | 1882 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4604 | 4213 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD A10-6800K | Intel Core i7-4765T | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Richland | Haswell |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
| Launch date | 4 June 2013 | June 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $142 | $509 |
| OPN PIB | AD680KWOHLBOX | |
| OPN Tray | AD680KWOA44HL | |
| Place in performance rating | 1514 | 1489 |
| Series | AMD A10-Series APU for Desktops | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $399.99 | |
| Processor Number | i7-4765T | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 5.38 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 4.1 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
| Die size | 246 mm | 177 mm |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm SOI | 22 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | 66 °C |
| Maximum core temperature | 74°C | 66.35°C |
| Maximum frequency | 4.4 GHz | 3.00 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 8 |
| Transistor count | 1303 Million | 1400 million |
| Unlocked | ||
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
| L3 cache | 8192 KB (shared) | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | |
Graphics |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Graphics max frequency | 844 MHz | 1.2 GHz |
| iGPU core count | 384 | |
| Number of pipelines | 384 | |
| Processor graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8670D | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 |
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Device ID | 0x412 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.20 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 2 GB | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
| VGA | ||
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 11.2/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | FM2 | FCLGA1150 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2013A | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | Up to 3.0 |
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over eDP | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
| Max resolution over VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||