AMD A9-9400 SoC vs AMD A10-6800K
Comparative analysis of AMD A9-9400 SoC and AMD A10-6800K processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A9-9400 SoC
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 32 nm SOI
- Around 33% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 49.738 vs 10.547
- 19.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.848 vs 0.604
- 5.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 21.079 vs 3.801
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5100 vs 4604
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5100 vs 4604
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | May 2016 vs 4 June 2013 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm SOI |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 192 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 49.738 vs 10.547 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.848 vs 0.604 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 21.079 vs 3.801 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5100 vs 4604 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5100 vs 4604 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A10-6800K
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 83% higher clock speed: 4.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1596 vs 1230
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3189 vs 1363
- Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.893 vs 2.759
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1267 vs 894
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4136 vs 1799
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1267 vs 894
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4136 vs 1799
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 4.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz |
| L2 cache | 4 MB vs 1024 KB (per core) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1596 vs 1230 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3189 vs 1363 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.893 vs 2.759 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1267 vs 894 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4136 vs 1799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1267 vs 894 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4136 vs 1799 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A9-9400 SoC
CPU 2: AMD A10-6800K
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD A9-9400 SoC | AMD A10-6800K |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1230 | 1596 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1363 | 3189 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.759 | 4.893 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 49.738 | 10.547 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.848 | 0.604 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 21.079 | 3.801 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 894 | 1267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1799 | 4136 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5100 | 4604 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 894 | 1267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1799 | 4136 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5100 | 4604 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 542 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1494 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.209 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD A9-9400 SoC | AMD A10-6800K | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Stoney Ridge | Richland |
| Launch date | May 2016 | 4 June 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1537 | 1505 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $142 | |
| OPN PIB | AD680KWOHLBOX | |
| OPN Tray | AD680KWOA44HL | |
| Series | AMD A10-Series APU for Desktops | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 124 mm | 246 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB (per core) | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm SOI |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | 74 °C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 1200 million | 1303 Million |
| Base frequency | 4.1 GHz | |
| Maximum core temperature | 74°C | |
| Number of threads | 4 | |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Sockets supported | FM2 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Graphics |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Graphics max frequency | 844 MHz | |
| iGPU core count | 384 | |
| Number of pipelines | 384 | |
| Processor graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8670D | |
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD A9-9400 SoC with others
AMDA9-9400 SoC vs
AMDPhenom II X4 830
AMDA9-9400 SoC vs
AMDA8-3850
AMDA9-9400 SoC vs
IntelCeleron G1850
AMDA9-9400 SoC vs
IntelCore i3-3250T
AMDA9-9400 SoC vs
IntelCore i7-4790T
AMDA9-9400 SoC vs
AMDA6-9400
